• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Picture request please - 5-lug conversion using 96+ spindles and SN95 rear axles

  • Thread starter Thread starter caseywan
  • Start date Start date Jan 21, 2008
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

Metalcop

Active Member
Jun 6, 2004
148
1
28
New Hampshire
Feb 14, 2008
#41
  • Feb 14, 2008
  • #41
Small thread resurrection. I have a quick question. The wheels I am going to be putting on have a +15 offset. I am using 98 SN95 spindles, which add +13 in offset, correct? So essentially I will be around +4mm in offset, from the standard Fox offset of 23.8mm ? I am having trouble with the basic understanding of 'offset' so is this correct?

Positive offset, built into the wheel itself, moves the wheel inward, towards the strut/engine side.

Positive offset, 'gained' when changing spindles, (fox to SN95) moves the wheel outward, towards the fender lip.

So by running a wheel with +15 and adding +13 from the spindle I will be at +28 of offset, and +4mm (increased towards the fenderwell) from the standard Fox offset?

Thanks for your help! :SNSign:
 
I

iwashmycar

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 7, 2004
1,236
1
39
Columbus, Ohio
Feb 14, 2008
#42
  • Feb 14, 2008
  • #42
^^^^^
wow...siiiick stance

like was said i think thats the combo to run the s197s as well

View attachment 330299
View attachment 330300
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Feb 15, 2008
#43
  • Feb 15, 2008
  • #43
Mustang5L5 said:
You have an entire 2001 rear end?


Unsure if you are aware of it, but the 1999-2004 8.8 housings are longer than the 86-98 housings. As a result, the wheels offset is almost 1.25" EACH side more than the fox offset. 3/4" of it is due to the SN95 brakes but the remaining 3/4" is due to the increase in housing.

If you got an 86-98 housing and used 94-98 SN95 axles, you would pull your wheels back in 0.75"
Click to expand...

Yes, I have the entire rear axle. I used everything from the 2001, ABS unit, lines, sensors etc. I also had new bearings, seals, clutches, and gears put in the 2001 axle before I installed it. They also straightened the tubes and weldee them. I sunk a little bit of money in it, so I am keeping it. At the time....I didn't have any 8.8's from a 94-98 Mustang in the yard. Now....I have bought two 95GT's since then.... I thought of swapping them, but I already have 3.73's and all the other stuff I listed. I think I will compensate with the larger offset wheels. We will see how it goes. I just want to get the car done right now. I can always change it later, but I dread swapping axles with aftermarket control arms.
 

Dmarstroker

Member
Aug 8, 2006
116
1
19
Vancouver, WA
May 12, 2008
#44
  • May 12, 2008
  • #44
I have a 17x8 wheel that has a 26mm offset, do you guys think I will be fine if I run a 96+ spindle?
 

bgjohnson

Founding Member
Sep 1, 2002
963
0
16
johnston,iowa
May 13, 2008
#45
  • May 13, 2008
  • #45
So has anybody ran the S197 wheels with the 96+ spindles?
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
May 13, 2008
#46
  • May 13, 2008
  • #46
05+ wheels with +45mm offset with 96-04 spindles. They still have the 235-55's on them though, so 245-45's will be look better, just look where the wheel lip sits. Don't pay attention to my rears. I have the entire 2001 rear end in my car with 17X9 +45mm offset Bullits. They are dead even with the quarter edge, and if I used 94-98 axles, the wheels would sit inward 3/4".







Now here is 17X8 +30mm offset and 96-04 spindles. They do not stick out.






17X9's, +24mm offset with 96-04 spindles the wheels will stick out the front fenders about 1/2".

17X9's, +26mm offset with 96-04 spindles the wheels will still stick out the fenders, but will stick out 2mm less than 17X9's with the +24mm offset. They will still clear the strut.

This combo would also probably hit the struts with 94-95 spindles, because they will bring the wheel 8-10mm closer to the strut. Spacers are always an option, but I don't like them.
 

Dmarstroker

Member
Aug 8, 2006
116
1
19
Vancouver, WA
May 13, 2008
#47
  • May 13, 2008
  • #47
Alright so it looks like I might just have to run a smaller tire so it wont look like its sticking out. Im thinking of going with a 235-40-17.
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
May 14, 2008
#48
  • May 14, 2008
  • #48
Smaller tire? For what wheels? You can run a standard 245-45 on either style wheel with 96+ spindles. Neither offset 17X8 will stick out.
 

Dmarstroker

Member
Aug 8, 2006
116
1
19
Vancouver, WA
May 14, 2008
#49
  • May 14, 2008
  • #49
SVT32VDOHC said:
Smaller tire? For what wheels? You can run a standard 245-45 on either style wheel with 96+ spindles. Neither offset 17X8 will stick out.
Click to expand...

My bad for not explaining, the main reason why I also wanted to run a smaller tire (overall diameter wise) was because I am also going to go with the steeda X2 ball joints and in the instructions it said that it will lower it another 1/2 inch just with the ball joints. With the stang sitting lower than it already is I was thinking that it could have a little rubbing issue with it being lower and with the tire right ON or close to the edge of the fender.
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
May 14, 2008
#50
  • May 14, 2008
  • #50
Okay, no problem. A 235-45-17 will give you just a touch of extra clearance and it will still look good on an 8 inch wheel. The last V6 Mustang I bought had 17X8 Bullits and 235's...I couldn't even tell untill I actually got down and looked for the sizes.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
May 15, 2008
#51
  • May 15, 2008
  • #51
I have 235/45/17's on my '97 Cobra wheels on my 5.0. Good size if you ask me.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Rear Disc and Rims Offsets
  • TripleYellow
  • Nov 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 9, 2026
TripleYellow
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
417
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 15, 2026
FastDriver
S
Fox New to me 82 GT
  • Stangman7082
  • Jan 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 18, 2025
AeroCoupe
S
Drivetrain 8.8 Pinion and 302 rear main seal leaks after replacing. 93 5.0 with t-5
  • Steigy4827
  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
668
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 1, 2026
Steigy4827
S
N
Drivetrain Mustang II 5 stud rear axle conversion
  • Nordic Cowboy
  • Oct 28, 2023
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
6
Views
6K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Nov 1, 2023
Nordic Cowboy
N
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?