• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Pushrod Vs. modular

  • Thread starter Thread starter LilBerx
  • Start date Start date Jan 23, 2013
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

LilBerx

Active Member
Jan 11, 2012
340
26
29
Logan, UT
Jan 23, 2013
#1
  • Jan 23, 2013
  • #1
Well here goes nothing, lets hear some answers!

Which one is better for daily driving? I'm going to get a sn or new edge, I either want a 94-95 gt/cobra, a 96-98 cobra, or a 99-04 GT.

What's the pros and cons of each one?
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Jan 23, 2013
#2
  • Jan 23, 2013
  • #2
driveablity would be much better on a newer mod motor then a push rod...
 

JordanB21

Active Member
Feb 6, 2012
804
27
29
Killeen, Texas
Jan 23, 2013
#3
  • Jan 23, 2013
  • #3
You can buy the modular cobra w/more horsepower (300) for a good price (96-98, not 99-04, they look better) versus the 95s which came with 240 horsepower.

95 cobra-city 15, HWY 23
98 cobra-city 16, HWY 24
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Jan 23, 2013
#4
  • Jan 23, 2013
  • #4
Given those choices id probably go for the 94-98 cobra, i always liked those cars, they can be had for good deals too. Do you plan on keeping the cars stock? If thats the case reliability and drivability will pretty much be a wash.
 

LilBerx

Active Member
Jan 11, 2012
340
26
29
Logan, UT
Jan 23, 2013
#5
  • Jan 23, 2013
  • #5
Minor bolt ons... Probably intake, exhaust, gears, dyno tune.
 

GroverDill

GoldMember
Founding Member
Aug 18, 1999
5,442
1,490
214
Demotte IN 46310
Jan 23, 2013
#6
  • Jan 23, 2013
  • #6
I enjoy the low end torque of the pushrod cars especially in street driving
 
Reactions: toolow91, LilBerx and 90lxcoupe

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Jan 23, 2013
#7
  • Jan 23, 2013
  • #7
GroverDill said:
I enjoy the low end torque of the pushrod cars especially in street driving
Click to expand...

Good point, most of the 96-98 cobras i see for sale have 4.30 gears. Probably kills the mileage on the highway.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,265
17,952
224
Massachusetts
Jan 23, 2013
#8
  • Jan 23, 2013
  • #8
If you are going to stick to bolt on's and want fuel economy, go with the 4.6L

If you plan on really modding the engine, go withthe pushrod.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jan 23, 2013
#9
  • Jan 23, 2013
  • #9
No contest. The later model 4.6L. If you plan on tearing into the engine, the 5.0L is more "rewarding" (Heads, Cam, intake) as far as horsepower gains, but if you want bolt on and go, the 4.6L modular is your clear choice. Not to mention the EEC V is much more refined and easier to tune than the earlier EEC IV.
 

LilBerx

Active Member
Jan 11, 2012
340
26
29
Logan, UT
Jan 23, 2013
#10
  • Jan 23, 2013
  • #10
I agree with Grover about the low end of a pushrod... I want a clean sn-95 or a really clean 99-04 gt, preferably an 01.5-04. I found a 98 cobra nearby that has 83k and they only want 7800... This Will be my first purchase with a loan... (I am still young), and I do realize a note will go against having money to dump into mods, but I may part my fox out seeing how it has some desirable parts on it... And I'll be keeping The rear end and control arms for whatever I buy. I am going to try and get my buddy to part with his 99 before I buy anything, this will happen by match or April.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Jan 23, 2013
#11
  • Jan 23, 2013
  • #11
There are only three Mod engines I would trade my 5.0 for...those are the '00 5.4 Cobra, '03 Cobra, and '11 Coyote. Everything else, I'll stick with my tried and true pushrod 347.
 
Reactions: 88LX5.Oh and 90lxcoupe

Mintsick

10 Year Member
Jan 6, 2007
589
39
68
West Lafayette, IN
Jan 23, 2013
#12
  • Jan 23, 2013
  • #12
In stock or mildly modified form I don't think any of the engine combos you've listed are a concern with regards to daily driving reliability. Personally I'd go with a 99-04 based on exterior looks.
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Jan 23, 2013
#13
  • Jan 23, 2013
  • #13
I liked the 4.6 that was in my fox. Although initially, I had to warm to it. Modding the engine is obviously wayy more expensive than a typical SBF and there aren't 50 bazillion suppliers making hipo junk for it accordingly. A post 02', P.I. headed engine should be your bottom line if you're considering one though as the head design has been upgraded to add like 15 more HP over the previous iterations. In retrospect, had I known then what I know today,..I would've held out for a 4v version of the engine when I bought mine.
As for the body. I'm not a fan of a new edge body, but I'd take a beat up version of one of them, before I'd be seen in a pristine, but butt ugly 94-98 anyday.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jan 23, 2013
#14
  • Jan 23, 2013
  • #14
Modulars are bigger, more complex, parts are more expensive and aftermarket support is smaller than the 302/351 Windsor. 2V anything is an embarrassment to the term “OHC”… Just talk to some (legit) import guys about hp/ci. That said, a 4V Cobra with no changes to the top end, forged bottom end parts, and a blower or turbo is an easy 500-600 hp, drive every day sort of thing, and would be 100% awesome. IMO, nothing 4.6 is worth owning unless it’s got bewst.
 
Reactions: 90lxcoupe

RacEoHolic330

I like to dress like a pretty girl
15 Year Member
Mar 4, 2003
4,014
1,698
203
Allentown, PA
Jan 23, 2013
#15
  • Jan 23, 2013
  • #15
GroverDill said:
I enjoy the low end torque of the pushrod cars especially in street driving
Click to expand...

That 76mm probably helps a tad with you're torque
 

GroverDill

GoldMember
Founding Member
Aug 18, 1999
5,442
1,490
214
Demotte IN 46310
Jan 23, 2013
#16
  • Jan 23, 2013
  • #16
lol

my 327 cubed, S trimed, T56 trans full griggs 86 is a fantastic DD

but it only makes 460 rwhp and 480 rwtq..............................
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jan 24, 2013
#17
  • Jan 24, 2013
  • #17
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
There are only three Mod engines I would trade my 5.0 for...those are the '00 5.4 Cobra, '03 Cobra, and '11 Coyote. Everything else, I'll stick with my tried and true pushrod 347.
Click to expand...
Easy to say. Yours is stroked and poked with a full top end and stuffed into your car of choice. Of course you're not going to trade it for one of the above mentioned....

...now, what it if your choices were a wheezing 215hp E7TE 302 wrapped in an SN95, an early wheezing 215hp 4.6L in an SN95 or a later 260hp 4.6L in a New Edge?

NIKwoaC said:
IMO, nothing 4.6 is worth owning unless it’s got bewst.
Click to expand...

But that's the game changer isn't it? Like a 4.6L without boost is pretty anemic, so too is a stock 5.0L HO without a complete top end kit.

You're gonna have to sink time and money into each to make either one of them worthy of their namesake by today’s standards. And if it came right down to it, I'd rather quote labour rates on installing a blower on a 4.6L OHC, over a H/C/I upgrade on a 5.0L OHV. In the end though, given the same budget, the modular is still going to retain the better daily driver status, while making more power to boot.

I dig both engines, but each has their strong points...and while the 5.0L OHV may get the hp/$ nod when it comes to replacing the top end, the mod motor takes the ball and runs when it comes to forced induction.

In the end....a H/C/I 5.0L OHV, no matter how powerful you build it, at best is still only going to be able to outrun the blown modular....and even then not without exceeding the cost. His other criteria associated with daily drivability (smooth running, good fuel economy, low emissions, etc) however will have taken a nose dive and in the end still lean heavily in the 4.6L's favour.
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,672
89
79
Cyprus
Jan 24, 2013
#18
  • Jan 24, 2013
  • #18
LilBerx said:
Which one is better for daily driving? I'm going to get a sn or new edge, I either want a 94-95 gt/cobra, a 96-98 cobra, or a 99-04 GT.

What's the pros and cons of each one?
Click to expand...

94-95 GT/Cobra: Pushrod 5.0 very easy to work on & DIY friendly. GT only has 215hp but responds very well to simple bolt-on mods. Parts are cheap and plentiful. Cobra has uprated brakes and 240hp out-of-the box so HP potential even higher with simple bolt-ons.

96-98 Cobra: Great engine, great soundtrack, 305hp, desirable Teksid block, uprated brakes. Restrictive exhaust so responds very well to LT headers, midpipe, catbacks. If you must have a 96-98 model, get the Cobra. The 2V GT engine comes with only 215hp/225hp, mods aren't cheap, and it doesn't respond well to bolt-on mods either so consider it the redheaded stepchild unless the PO has added a supercharger.

99-04 GT: New Edge styling, better brakes, and better engine (260hp) than 96-98 GT. Responds well to simple bolt-ons but they're not cheap. Cobras (especially '01+) more desirable with 320hp N/A ('01) but WAP block not as strong as earlier Teksid. The 390hp supercharged '03-'04 Terminator is the ultimate but expensive.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jan 24, 2013
#19
  • Jan 24, 2013
  • #19
Gearbanger 101 said:
But that's the game changer isn't it? Like a 4.6L without boost is pretty anemic, so too is a stock 5.0L HO without a complete top end kit.

You're gonna have to sink time and money into each to make either one of them worthy of their namesake by today’s standards. And if it came right down to it, I'd rather quote labour rates on installing a blower on a 4.6L OHC, over a H/C/I upgrade on a 5.0L OHV. In the end though, given the same budget, the modular is still going to retain the better daily driver status, while making more power to boot.

I dig both engines, but each has their strong points...and while the 5.0L OHV may get the hp/$ nod when it comes to replacing the top end, the mod motor takes the ball and runs when it comes to forced induction.

In the end....a H/C/I 5.0L OHV, no matter how powerful you build it, at best is still only going to be able to outrun the blown modular....and even then not without exceeding the cost. His other criteria associated with daily drivability (smooth running, good fuel economy, low emissions, etc) however will have taken a nose dive and in the end still lean heavily in the 4.6L's favour.
Click to expand...


I'm not disagreeing with you, and I don't think you're really disagreeing with me. Mod motors are expensive and complex, but because of the good block strength and decent flowing 3 or 4V cylinder heads, they can do well under boost. Unfortunately without boost, they ain’t much to talk about unless you dump $10K into them.

Also, drivability is totally a function of camshaft and tune. Pushrod cams are cheap (cuz you only gotta buy one…) and most pushrod guys jam big noisy bumpsticks between their cylinder banks and employ hack tuning methods, so it’s not surprising they have a reputation for being less drivable than mod motors. There are some guys out there that are starting to do boost on good cylinder heads and stock cam, and suddenly you have a low 11/high 10 second car that almost drives like it’s stock. Of course then the 302 block is on the verge of self-destruction, so the 4.6 gets the nod there.

…But then you’ve got the big tree-fiddy-won blocks that are safe into 7-800 HP range (arguably more for the early blocks) and deep 9s in the quarter… So how fast you wanna go?

That’s the beauty of all this… More than one way to skin a cat. Just gotta understand what knife to use.
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Jan 24, 2013
#20
  • Jan 24, 2013
  • #20
NIKwoaC said:
I'm not disagreeing with you, and I don't think you're really disagreeing with me. Mod motors are expensive and complex, but because of the good block strength and decent flowing 3 or 4V cylinder heads, they can do well under boost. Unfortunately without boost, they ain’t much to talk about unless you dump $10K into them.

Also, drivability is totally a function of camshaft and tune. Pushrod cams are cheap (cuz you only gotta buy one…) and most pushrod guys jam big noisy bumpsticks between their cylinder banks and employ hack tuning methods, so it’s not surprising they have a reputation for being less drivable than mod motors. There are some guys out there that are starting to do boost on good cylinder heads and stock cam, and suddenly you have a low 11/high 10 second car that almost drives like it’s stock. Of course then the 302 block is on the verge of self-destruction, so the 4.6 gets the nod there.

…But then you’ve got the big tree-fiddy-won blocks that are safe into 7-800 HP range (arguably more for the early blocks) and deep 9s in the quarter… So how fast you wanna go?

That’s the beauty of all this… More than one way to skin a cat. Just gotta understand what knife to use.
Click to expand...
you can go mid high 11's NA in a 2v with some junk yard parts if you know where and what to look for... they dont need to be boosted. granted boost is sexy as hell!
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
958
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
766
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
Brakes Need help ID’ing which brake lines and seals I need
  • AnthonyA1234
  • Apr 2, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
960
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 14, 2025
limp
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
10K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
794
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?