• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Rubbing Tires (Standard size)

  • Thread starter Thread starter gstsaver
  • Start date Start date Jul 19, 2018
  • Tags Tags
    rubbing standard size tires
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,255
17,939
224
Massachusetts
Jul 21, 2018
#21
  • Jul 21, 2018
  • #21
And control arm.

My '88 s original wheels never came close to the control arm when it was bone stock. Only time I saw this was an issue was when there was a balljoints or bushing issue. I'd definitely want to explore mechanical failure before writing it off as normal.
 

91TwighlightGT

20+ Year Stangneter
Sep 8, 2002
1,190
375
124
Missouri
Jul 21, 2018
#22
  • Jul 21, 2018
  • #22
Yeah, rubbing the plastic liner is one thing, the control arm is the concerning part.

If the suspension is okay, then he will need rack limiters. Would like to see pics. Watching the rack, tie rods, and suspension while someone turns the wheels lock to lock may show something as well.
 
G

gstsaver

Member
May 6, 2018
75
5
18
Australia
Jul 22, 2018
#23
  • Jul 22, 2018
  • #23
The tires rub against the inner fender, the plastic holding and the control arm. Here are some pics, it is basically the same on both sides of the car. Not sure if the control arm put comes across ok but it is 'shiny' where it rubs. Also, the inner fender plastic is just beside the plastic holding where it is rubbing. Looking at it now I see an alignment isn't going to fix it.
 

Attachments

  • 20180722_174550_resized.webp
    245.5 KB · Views: 213
  • 20180722_174812_resized.webp
    137.1 KB · Views: 226
G

gstsaver

Member
May 6, 2018
75
5
18
Australia
Jul 22, 2018
#24
  • Jul 22, 2018
  • #24
Never been lowered. Tie rods and ball joints all good.
Here are some pics. It is on the plastic m olding as well...but you can perhaps see in the pic the shiny part of the control arm where they rub as well. Also the plastic inner fender near where the body moulding is rubbing as well.
 

Attachments

  • 20180722_174550_resized.webp
    245.5 KB · Views: 217
  • 20180722_174812_resized.webp
    137.1 KB · Views: 196

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,255
17,939
224
Massachusetts
Jul 22, 2018
#25
  • Jul 22, 2018
  • #25
How's the balljoints?

Pending confirming it's ok, I'd prob install one of these each side and call it a day.

https://lmr.com/item/LRS-3504HDW/79...MIw4fJucSy3AIVRbnACh0JDgHQEAAYASAAEgJdL_D_BwE

Only the control arm rub raises my eyebrow. The other rub I would agree is typical
 

91TwighlightGT

20+ Year Stangneter
Sep 8, 2002
1,190
375
124
Missouri
Jul 22, 2018
#26
  • Jul 22, 2018
  • #26
Here is a question - is the rack original? Sometimes when you buy reman racks they don’t have the limiters. I was always under the impression that the early cars (79-90) didn’t have limiters. 91-93 definitely did because of the change to 16 inch wheels.
 

Blown88GT

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1999
2,283
524
164
Palm Beach Gardens, FL
Jul 22, 2018
#27
  • Jul 22, 2018
  • #27
Mustang5L5 said:
...Only the control arm rub raises my eyebrow. The other rub I would agree is typical
Click to expand...
I agree, mine never rubbed the control arm. The other rub looks exactly like mine.
Back then, they were producing these so fast, all kinds of mistakes were made & QC was ignored or nonexistant. Not as many robots then (if any). A friend of mine had an early 80's Dodge Charger, took the rear wheel off to change it & noticed a large yellow circle drawn in crayon or paint. Compared it to the opposite side & it was clear that QC had caught a missing weld. They completed, shipped & sold the vehicle without ever repairing the unwelded section. Ford was no different.

In the case of the early GT's, the rubbing issue finally got back to engineering for a fix but it wasn't implemented until later years when existing parts supplies were used up. It was done when the wheels went to 5-lug, 16 inch. If you put an early & later GT side by side, you can see a very subtle difference in the skirts. Just in time manufacturing was introduced by the Japanese & later adopted by US companies in the early '90's which eliminated inventories of "bad" parts.
 
Last edited: Jul 22, 2018

91TwighlightGT

20+ Year Stangneter
Sep 8, 2002
1,190
375
124
Missouri
Jul 22, 2018
#28
  • Jul 22, 2018
  • #28
Couple of things... the skirts changed, but so did the fenders. The 16 inch wheels did cause the change, but unless you had a 93 Cobra R you got 4 lugs on an Aero nose Fox.
 

Boostedpimp

20+ Year Stangneter
May 8, 2003
1,451
493
154
NJ
Jul 23, 2018
#29
  • Jul 23, 2018
  • #29
 

Blown88GT

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1999
2,283
524
164
Palm Beach Gardens, FL
Jul 23, 2018
#30
  • Jul 23, 2018
  • #30
Thanks for that pic.
https://lmr.com/products/Fox-Body-Mustang-Wheel-Tire-Guide
Must be a difference at the back side of the front wheel, too?
 

91TwighlightGT

20+ Year Stangneter
Sep 8, 2002
1,190
375
124
Missouri
Jul 23, 2018
#31
  • Jul 23, 2018
  • #31
Blown88GT said:
Thanks for that pic.
https://lmr.com/products/Fox-Body-Mustang-Wheel-Tire-Guide
Must be a difference at the back side of the front wheel, too?
Click to expand...

No because then the side skirts going back would not be interchangeable .
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Fox Tire Size for 16" Pony Wheels on 1984 LX Convertible
  • gw7
  • Jun 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
91
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 24, 2026
Mustang5L5
B
Tire size question 1986 gt hatchback
  • B0udreaux
  • Jan 12, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
585
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 17, 2026
B0udreaux
B
Wheel backspacing
  • Brad Hanks
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
497
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 25, 2025
Brad Hanks
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
393
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 15, 2026
FastDriver
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
179
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?