• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

V-8 to 6 swap

  • Thread starter Thread starter raidmagic
  • Start date Start date Dec 13, 2006
R

raidmagic

New Member
Dec 11, 2004
30
0
0
Dec 13, 2006
#1
  • Dec 13, 2006
  • #1
What are the ramifications if you put a V-8 in there and left the 6 cyl. suspension? Is that a rolling death trap? I have a friend looking to buy a car and that's the deal with it. He won't listen to me that this is a bad thing. Can you explain this please so I can explain it to him. Thanks for your time guys.
 

BullittStangV8

Founding Member
Oct 5, 2002
1,104
0
36
NJ
Dec 13, 2006
#2
  • Dec 13, 2006
  • #2
Its not really a bad thing. Tons of people here have done it. He would probably just have to swap out some springs, shocks, and if you want sway bar. Besides that I dont really see the issue. The rear end is probably a weak one, but thats easily replaced, and may even handle the power of the v8 if its not a strong running one/mod'd one. If the body and interior are in good shape, it could be a good deal?
 
A

andrewVA

New Member
Oct 13, 2004
20
0
1
Dec 13, 2006
#3
  • Dec 13, 2006
  • #3
Unless he is intending to drive like a granny, then yes its unsafe. With the added weight and power of a V-8, the i6 suspension and braking systems are going to be woefully inadequate. Chances are that car will handle and stop like a total pig. If he doesn't intend to change the related systems out, tell him to leave bus lengths between him and whoever he is following.

To put it in context, I have a 67 i6 coupe. It had manual drum brakes and even with the 200 in there, I would have to leave extra distance and mash the pedal as hard as I could just to come to a rolling stop. I just tore those drums apart last weekend and everything inside was new and clean, so the brakes were definitely not shot.

So the short answer is, could he drive it safely? Yes if he babies it. Will it be any fun? No.
 
M

mustangdave

My rearend needs a stud and two nuts.
Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
2,976
1
56
North Carolina
Dec 13, 2006
#4
  • Dec 13, 2006
  • #4
Well, yes and no. Drum brakes are crappy whether on a V8 or 6 cylinder car. From 67 up, the only thing different in the suspension is from the spindles out which makes it a five lug. Any old springs need to be replaced, so just replace them with slightly stiffer springs. Bigger sway bar helps.
I did the swap on a 67 and drove it with no changes for years. The brakes sucked and it leaned alot in corners so it was no performance ride for sure. As time and money allowed, I upgraded to V8 spindles (junkyard), 620 spings, roller perches, aftermarket upper control arms,etc...
If it is a pre-67 car, there are some dangers in weaker frt. end parts.
 

geostang351

Member
Mar 30, 2005
946
0
17
Danb., CT
Dec 13, 2006
#5
  • Dec 13, 2006
  • #5
The small rear end will not handle hard pedal pumps!
 
M

mustangdave

My rearend needs a stud and two nuts.
Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
2,976
1
56
North Carolina
Dec 13, 2006
#6
  • Dec 13, 2006
  • #6
geostang351 said:
The small rear end will not handle hard pedal pumps!
Click to expand...


I don't know what that means, but the title thread should read V8 to 6, not 6 to V8. Also, I kept my 6 banger rear end for about 10 years with no problem on a stock worn engine. I now have a 9" from a junkyard. The original read end still works perfect if anybody wants to pick it up.
 
R

raidmagic

New Member
Dec 11, 2004
30
0
0
Dec 13, 2006
#7
  • Dec 13, 2006
  • #7
Good info guys and yes I did botch the title.
 
A

andrewVA

New Member
Oct 13, 2004
20
0
1
Dec 13, 2006
#8
  • Dec 13, 2006
  • #8
mustangdave said:
If it is a pre-67 car, there are some dangers in weaker frt. end parts.
Click to expand...

Very good point. Maybe I missed it, but what year is the car.

67 and up the steering mechanism and most, if not all, of the suspension is the same. 65 and 66 the 6 cylinders had different, and weaker, steering and suspension systems from the 8 cylinders.
 
R

raidmagic

New Member
Dec 11, 2004
30
0
0
Dec 13, 2006
#9
  • Dec 13, 2006
  • #9
My mistake again I thought I said in my first post. It is a 67.
 
D

danny clemens

Member
May 4, 2005
728
0
16
Dec 13, 2006
#10
  • Dec 13, 2006
  • #10
My brother had a V8 in a 6 cyl car back in the late 60's. I think it was in there when he got it. It was a 65 or 66. He tore the rear out in no time at all. He did drive somewhat spirited though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1999–2004 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
876
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1996–1998 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
716
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
Removing speedo cable from the VSS
  • 91AOD5.0LX
  • Mar 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
823
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
91AOD5.0LX
R
Rcapri - 1980 Capri, bought new by inlaws
  • RCapri
  • Sep 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
864
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 20, 2025
manicmechanic007
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?