• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Exhaust Want to add cats

  • Thread starter Thread starter JD1964
  • Start date Start date Mar 20, 2022
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

Willybill32

But at least it's tight!
5 Year Member
Jul 16, 2019
630
353
83
Lexington, KY
Mar 26, 2022
#21
  • Mar 26, 2022
  • #21
7991LXnSHO said:
@Willybill32 your drool reaction makes me wonder if asking you to walk my pets might be misunderstood as wok them.
Click to expand...
@7991LXnSHO, sorry about that...I didn't realize the meaning of that emoji!

Bill
 
Reactions: General karthief and 7991LXnSHO

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,441
1,525
194
Maryland
Mar 27, 2022
#22
  • Mar 27, 2022
  • #22
Ok I now understand I need to put cats as close to engine as possible for them to be efficient at what they are designed to do.

I need to look under my car to see what space I have to splice in cats up front. I'm running an X pipe now, not an H. The X is just aft of the bell housing so it's closer to the front than some of the other aftermarket X and H pipes I see online now. I like the current X I have because just aft of the X is my wideband sensor. I like it there since it will sample a mixture of both engine banks. I dont want to change to a pipe that puts an X or H aft of the wideband sensor.
 

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Mar 28, 2022
#23
  • Mar 28, 2022
  • #23
John Dirks Jr said:
Ok I now understand I need to put cats as close to engine as possible for them to be efficient at what they are designed to do.

I need to look under my car to see what space I have to splice in cats up front. I'm running an X pipe now, not an H. The X is just aft of the bell housing so it's closer to the front than some of the other aftermarket X and H pipes I see online now. I like the current X I have because just aft of the X is my wideband sensor. I like it there since it will sample a mixture of both engine banks. I dont want to change to a pipe that puts an X or H aft of the wideband sensor.
Click to expand...
That brings up another issue. Your wide band sensor is in a spot where it’s a combined reading, but primary O2 sensors are also put ahead of the cats and work well hot. A dual reading gauge and two bungs for wide band sensors in front of your cats might be an answer to get it all to work.
Are you running the sensor to keep sn eye on how the car is running or is it hooked into an aftermarket EFI?
 

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,441
1,525
194
Maryland
Mar 28, 2022
#24
  • Mar 28, 2022
  • #24
The wideband is there primarily to monitor fuel mixture under boost. It’s not being used for active engine management in any way.
 

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Mar 28, 2022
#25
  • Mar 28, 2022
  • #25
John Dirks Jr said:
The wideband is there primarily to monitor fuel mixture under boost. It’s not being used for active engine management in any way.
Click to expand...
Then would it be bad to put a new O2 bung on one bank in front of the cats?
 

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,441
1,525
194
Maryland
Mar 28, 2022
#26
  • Mar 28, 2022
  • #26
7991LXnSHO said:
Then would it be bad to put a new O2 bung on one bank in front of the cats?
Click to expand...
Not necessarily bad but then the sampling would be from on bank only, rather than a mix of both.
 

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,441
1,525
194
Maryland
Aug 7, 2023
#27
  • Aug 7, 2023
  • #27
2000xp8 said:
If this were me? I'd just buy a catted x pipe and swap it on.
Click to expand...

I’m leaning towards Basssni catted x and fit it with two additional bungs for dual wideband setup. Two pod A pillar trim so I can watch A/F on both banks in real time.

I’ll be 59 1/2 in November which allows me to tap my 401k (federal TSP actually) without penalty. If I take the money from there, it’s only a drop in the bucket.
 

Willybill32

But at least it's tight!
5 Year Member
Jul 16, 2019
630
353
83
Lexington, KY
Aug 7, 2023
#28
  • Aug 7, 2023
  • #28
JD1964 said:
I’m leaning towards Basssni catted x and fit it with two additional bungs for dual wideband setup. Two pod A pillar trim so I can watch A/F on both banks in real time.

I’ll be 59 1/2 in November which allows me to tap my 401k (federal TSP actually) without penalty. If I take the money from there, it’s only a drop in the bucket.
Click to expand...
The Bassani catted X-pipe is a nice piece. I replaced the stock H-pipe on my ‘86 with the Bassani and really like it.

Bill
 
Reactions: JD1964

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,258
17,941
224
Massachusetts
Aug 7, 2023
#29
  • Aug 7, 2023
  • #29
I have the Bassani catted X-pipe on my car. Fit really well and was a quality peice.
 
Reactions: JD1964

AeroCoupe

lube between the nut and the face. I know my lubes
Founding Member
Oct 28, 2001
5,886
4,009
183
Claremore, OK
Aug 7, 2023
#30
  • Aug 7, 2023
  • #30
You can monitor two wide bands with one gauge if you look around.
 

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,441
1,525
194
Maryland
Aug 7, 2023
#31
  • Aug 7, 2023
  • #31
AeroCoupe said:
You can monitor two wide bands with one gauge if you look around.
Click to expand...
Right now I have PLX. I'm not sure about anything new they might have. I do know the single PLX gauge I currently have can monitor multiple different individual modules but only one at a time. For instance, I currently have modules for vac/boost and wideband AF. I can switch between the two but I cant view both at the same time on one gauge. With a second PLX gauge, I know I could do both boost and AF (one bank) at the same time. Or both banks AF at the same time.
 

limp

wrap a little cheese around it and its a done
5 Year Member
Oct 4, 2020
5,466
2,899
173
Florida
Aug 7, 2023
#32
  • Aug 7, 2023
  • #32
JD1964 said:
I’ll be 59 1/2 in November which allows me to tap my 401k (federal TSP actually) without penalty. If I take the money from there, it’s only a drop in the bucket.
Click to expand...
You will still have to pay taxes on it... I think they will take 20% for taxes.....
Its a weird change from putting money into it to when you start taking some of it.....
 

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,441
1,525
194
Maryland
Aug 8, 2023
#33
  • Aug 8, 2023
  • #33
limp said:
You will still have to pay taxes on it... I think they will take 20% for taxes.....
Its a weird change from putting money into it to when you start taking some of it.....
Click to expand...
Yes I understand the tax implications. It’s not much different than paying taxes on your regular paycheck.

Pay ‘em now or pay ‘em later.
 
Reactions: limp and General karthief

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,441
1,525
194
Maryland
Aug 12, 2023
#34
  • Aug 12, 2023
  • #34
I'm thinking about seeing if theres room to weld these in just after the factory o2 position. That way they will be closer to the engine for good exhaust conversion. This will let me retain my current X which has the wideband location just after the X and samples both banks with 1 sensor. I know theres discussion about error in wideband readings after cats but any errors are not big enough to scare me. If anything it might be up to 3% lean reading after the cat. I see no problem in that event because if I tune to 11.8 at WOT under boost I'm really at 11.5 ish. Nothing scary there as the error nudges you to the safer side of the spectrum anyway.
 
Reactions: General karthief

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,441
1,525
194
Maryland
Aug 16, 2023
#35
  • Aug 16, 2023
  • #35
It’s been a while since I drove the LX but I just got back from a little cruise. Man it’s fun to drive, especially with some tunes playing!

I’m chomping at the bit to get some cats on it, get the blower back in service and start tuning
 
Reactions: General karthief

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,441
1,525
194
Maryland
Aug 17, 2023
#36
  • Aug 17, 2023
  • #36
I got the car jacked up good and got under to see where there's room to splice in a pair of Magnaflow 2.5" cats with metallic substrate.

My mid pipe loos like a custom made piece and I've not seen another like it. The X is directly under the gearbox portion of the transmission and I mean totally forward of the trans tail housing. Most other mid pipes I've seen have the X or H fully after the trans tail housing including BBK, Bassani and Pypes.

One option is to put the cats forward of the X which would be nice and close to the engine and would get the cats really hot for good exhaust conversion. However this location is a tight squeeze and would require some custom bending and welding. This would also put the cats forward of my wideband which is not ideal but I could live with.

Option 2 is a simple install which I could even do myself using stainless steel band clamps. The position is aft of the X and directly parallel with the trans tail housing. Lots of room there which is great for heat clearance to any of the components in that area. It's also aft of my wideband which is a plus too. The downside of this position is that its further back from the engine although I don't think its too far back for the cats to work well.

I measured the position of option 2 and its 3 1/2 feet forward of the mufflers and 2 feet aft of the engine. So, is 2 feet aft of the engine too far to get good cat function to kill the stink? If it's not, then option 2 is a no brainer for me.

I attached some pictures but the car was on jackstands. Wider angle pics with the car on a lift would have been better for perspective.

Pic 1 is the forward position. Pic 2 is the aft position. Pic 3 and 4 are wider angle shots for perspective.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1772.webp
    1.2 MB · Views: 90
  • IMG_1773.webp
    427.3 KB · Views: 96
  • IMG_1774.webp
    782 KB · Views: 89
  • IMG_1775.webp
    869.8 KB · Views: 90

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,029
1,619
194
NJ
Aug 17, 2023
#37
  • Aug 17, 2023
  • #37
This has headache written all over it.
Just buy a quality stainless pre made catted pipe.
In the long run, i bet it will be cheaper.

I could see giving this a go if the existing pipe was stainless, but clearly it is not.
 

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,441
1,525
194
Maryland
Aug 17, 2023
#38
  • Aug 17, 2023
  • #38
2000xp8 said:
This has headache written all over it.
Just buy a quality stainless pre made catted pipe.
In the long run, i bet it will be cheaper.

I could see giving this a go if the existing pipe was stainless, but clearly it is not.
Click to expand...
I understand that response no problem. I wont argue with you about it. However, I'd still like opinions on if 2 feet aft of the engine (right at the position of the trans tail housing) is close enough to the engine for the cats to work right. Heck, that's closer than the cats on the Bassani mid pipe right?
 

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,441
1,525
194
Maryland
Aug 17, 2023
#39
  • Aug 17, 2023
  • #39
BTW, this pipe may not be stainless but its rock solid, seriously. And if I'm using band clamps there will be no deforming of the pipe or cat inlets so the cats could always be easily removed and used in other applications or vehicles.
 

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,441
1,525
194
Maryland
Aug 17, 2023
#40
  • Aug 17, 2023
  • #40
I think the pipe material is aluminized. Old yes and a bit of surface rust, but rock solid.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Exhaust 4 Cats required for smog in California?
  • Codosuarus
  • Sep 28, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 6, 2025
Scottyding73
S
T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
260
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
S
Progress Thread 1989 LX 5.0 convertible - mild project
  • Scott_S
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 4 5 6
Replies
107
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 26, 2026
AeroCoupe
F
California, Daly City representing here! Hello!
  • FATTS_DC
  • Feb 9, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
290
The Welcome Wagon Feb 10, 2025
LILCBRA
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?