• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Which gas to run?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 03SteedaGT
  • Start date Start date Dec 10, 2003
0

03SteedaGT

New Member
Oct 27, 2003
82
0
0
Knoxville, TN
Dec 10, 2003
#1
  • Dec 10, 2003
  • #1
I know this has been covered before but I had a friend telling me that he is making more horsepower and getting better mileage by running 87 octane in his stock 02GT. I was wondering if anyone could explain this to me. I have ran 93 in mine since it rolled off the showroom floor. Am I hurting it? or just wasting my money since the timming is set so low from the factory? please any info would be nice.
 

StangLou

Active Member
Jul 9, 2003
1,264
0
36
Holly Springs, NC
Dec 10, 2003
#2
  • Dec 10, 2003
  • #2
Tons of people do what you are doing, I was one of them. I now have a chip in mine so I have to run 93, but if I had it to do over again I would stick with plus at the most.
Also Ford has a "theory" behind all of the rough start problems that have been bothering a lot of '02 and '03 GT's. They think that for some reason the engines cant handle the extra octane. Also they feel that it is causing excess evaporation in the lines thus causing the crappy starts a lot of us have at first start after the car has sit for a while. I think its a bogus theory.
Look at it this way though. A car runs 89 for many years, it starts spark knocking so you add in plus. It cures it and for a few years your fine, then it starts knocking again, so you move to 93 and it cures it. Now that your at 93 where do you go from here? Rough cycle huh .
Oh well, thats my .02c
 

Venom4.6

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
1,356
0
0
Saint Louis, MO
Dec 10, 2003
#3
  • Dec 10, 2003
  • #3
With the stock timing and compression you are only wasting your money by going with the 93. When I had my GT I used 87 with no problems. This is what Ford recommends anyway.
 
D

DC-GT

New Member
Nov 25, 2003
312
0
0
Dec 10, 2003
#4
  • Dec 10, 2003
  • #4
I would say it is a personal preferrance thing. I run mostly 87 but once in a while I run 91. The higher octane fuels also have more detergent in them for cleaning engine vitals, so I am told. I figure if it is just a few cents a gallon, once a month, then it isn't hurtin me too bad, lol.

Bo
 

jadesville

the polarbear conservation corps protects a polarb
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 8, 2003
2,189
0
47
Gresham, OR
Dec 10, 2003
#5
  • Dec 10, 2003
  • #5
i use 91 octane from 76, isnt much more so i just say hell with it anyways
 

Aaron 4.6

Founding Member
Apr 10, 2001
2,695
0
0
Georgia
Dec 10, 2003
#6
  • Dec 10, 2003
  • #6
Is it hurting you? Only in the wallet.
Is it helping you? No.
 
E

el_kid_1

New Member
Oct 30, 2003
738
0
0
Puerto Rico
Dec 10, 2003
#7
  • Dec 10, 2003
  • #7
Hmmmm, that's interesting. I run 93 octane in my stang since I put the Superchip. I was told by the performance shop where I bought my Supechip, that I had to run on 93 octanes...is this true? Or am I just hurting my wallet? Anyways, the Superchip is coming off because the KB Kit is coming on pretty soon!
 

GreekStang85

Member
Jun 11, 2003
485
0
16
Dec 10, 2003
#8
  • Dec 10, 2003
  • #8
I usually use 89 and on some times ill use 93 becasue its good to use it every once in a while. but no matter what octane you get always get it from the same gas station brand. i usually fill mine up at sunoco or sometimes shell if i cant make it to sunoco.
 

jadesville

the polarbear conservation corps protects a polarb
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 8, 2003
2,189
0
47
Gresham, OR
Dec 10, 2003
#9
  • Dec 10, 2003
  • #9
el_kid_1 said:
Hmmmm, that's interesting. I run 93 octane in my stang since I put the Superchip. I was told by the performance shop where I bought my Supechip, that I had to run on 93 octanes...is this true? Or am I just hurting my wallet? Anyways, the Superchip is coming off because the KB Kit is coming on pretty soon!
Click to expand...

thats true, if you got it tuned on 93 octane, you gotta use 93 octane
 

) y2kGT (

New Member
Oct 24, 2003
281
0
0
Dec 11, 2003
#10
  • Dec 11, 2003
  • #10
wonder what would happen if i run 118 octane in my stang...lmao.. kaboom
 

jadesville

the polarbear conservation corps protects a polarb
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 8, 2003
2,189
0
47
Gresham, OR
Dec 11, 2003
#11
  • Dec 11, 2003
  • #11
) y2kGT ( said:
wonder what would happen if i run 118 octane in my stang...lmao.. kaboom
Click to expand...

you need a compression ratio greater than 16:1 and its leaded
 

rx7speed

New Member
Apr 11, 2003
314
0
0
wankel wonderland
Dec 11, 2003
#12
  • Dec 11, 2003
  • #12
if I remember right higher octane fuel has less BTU it can put out which means less pressure in the cylinder due to less heat

all of such can cut power, gas mileage, and such

is it cleaner burning? doubt it
more detergents?
doubt it

just makes the car less prone to detonation

so if your car isn't detonation why use it?
 

decoy562

New Member
Oct 9, 2003
1,526
0
0
Acworth, GA
Dec 11, 2003
#13
  • Dec 11, 2003
  • #13
03SteedaGT said:
I know this has been covered before but I had a friend telling me that he is making more horsepower and getting better mileage by running 87 octane in his stock 02GT. I was wondering if anyone could explain this to me. I have ran 93 in mine since it rolled off the showroom floor. Am I hurting it? or just wasting my money since the timming is set so low from the factory? please any info would be nice.
Click to expand...

Unless you have advanced timing, 87 octane is fine.
 

MT1083

New Member
Sep 16, 2003
1,033
0
0
Charlotte, NC
Dec 11, 2003
#14
  • Dec 11, 2003
  • #14
It's more of a mental thing with me but I have always run on premium gasoline. But when I have tried lower octane, I never had any problems
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
863
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2026
CAMTWO1070
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
653
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
2
Running very very rich
  • 2esoteric
  • Oct 31, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
317
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
Noobz347
P
Progress Thread New To Me 1988 GT - trying to set up vacuum lines for upper intake question
  • pindude80
  • May 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 9 10 11
Replies
214
Views
13K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 28, 2026
pindude80
P
J
Switched to e85 on the 3v and now it won't run right.
  • jcowdough
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
148
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 24, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?