• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

2000 GT Motor Build

  • Thread starter Thread starter nine2oneGT
  • Start date Start date Nov 17, 2011
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

nine2oneGT

Member
Apr 13, 2008
94
2
9
Austin, TX
Nov 17, 2011
#1
  • Nov 17, 2011
  • #1
OK guys I have not made a post in a while, been super busy, but I think its time to share this with the world.

Last December I decided to install a V-1 Vortech on my GT, lets just say she had some miles. Long story short it was a HUGE pain in the ass and the motor blew on the last dyno pull. Hung a piston then the broken rod poked 3 holes in the block.

Waited to save up some money for built motor. Decided to go with the MMR 1000hp stroker rotating assembly. Got a used block and had it bored. Got my stock heads stage 3 P&P, new everything with Crower cams. Should be around 9:1 compression. Been waiting for 3 months at the builder and finally got to pick it up. Here is a pic of it right after I picked it up:



Got a A1000 Aeromotive fuel system with my tank sumped, 80lb injectors, and SCT big air. Professional Parts Tyhoon intake top to bottom. Looking to run about 15lbs of boost with a Snow water/meth injection kit. ARP Mains and Head studs, Headman LTs. Builder says in the high 500s maybe 600s. Let me know what you guys think. Motor is being installed as we speak, going down to work on it this weekend. I will upload more pics from the build then.

UPDATE:

Car is running now, putting on miles for the break in period. Second page has more detailed updates and pictures.

 

Attachments

  • 563559df.webp
    25.2 KB · Views: 188
  • 12607179.webp
    53.1 KB · Views: 195

Stumbaugh

Member
May 13, 2010
903
13
19
Russellville, Ar
Nov 17, 2011
#2
  • Nov 17, 2011
  • #2
Everything looks good on your list, except that Intake. You really need to sell that intake and buy an Edelbrock Victor Jr with a 6061 Plenum, P51, or even a stock intake.
 

nine2oneGT

Member
Apr 13, 2008
94
2
9
Austin, TX
Nov 17, 2011
#3
  • Nov 17, 2011
  • #3
Stumbaugh said:
Everything looks good on your list, except that Intake. You really need to sell that intake and buy an Edelbrock Victor Jr with a 6061 Plenum, P51, or even a stock intake.
Click to expand...

I was going to with the Edelbrock Victor but the engine builder (Kotzur Racing Heads) recommended PP. Doubt there is that much difference anyway.
 

Stumbaugh

Member
May 13, 2010
903
13
19
Russellville, Ar
Nov 17, 2011
#4
  • Nov 17, 2011
  • #4
wow, they are the first people I have ever heard recommend PP intakes. There is definitely a good difference between an Edelbrock Victor Jr w/ 6061 Plenum vs a PP intake, plenum, and TB.

The one good thing is, is that you are running forced induction. So it's going to force the air in the engine no matter what. But I can promise you that with that short block, heads, cams, and that amount of boost, your choke point will definitely be the intake.
 

1fun281

Member
Mar 16, 2009
438
8
19
Atlanta Georgia
Nov 17, 2011
#5
  • Nov 17, 2011
  • #5
Get and edelbrock, and if you want to go above and beyond you can get the edelbrock ported as well, they love boost!!
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Nov 17, 2011
#6
  • Nov 17, 2011
  • #6
Build sounds solid, minus the intake! Honestly, i think you would be better off with a stock one. Also, just curious why you decided to go with a a1000? I have built two cars with a returnless, sumped fuel system with an a1000 and they both had problems on the dyno. A good in tank fuel pump with a kbbap would work great with the power range you are looking at.
 

nine2oneGT

Member
Apr 13, 2008
94
2
9
Austin, TX
Nov 18, 2011
#7
  • Nov 18, 2011
  • #7
Damn now you guys got me all worried about sending it back. I was back and forth on those damn combos for a week at least. The cost is about the same.

I got the A1000 because eventually this thing is going to be some sort of race car, but it does have a return.
 

nine2oneGT

Member
Apr 13, 2008
94
2
9
Austin, TX
Nov 18, 2011
#8
  • Nov 18, 2011
  • #8
OK, you guys talked me into it. The other intake hasn't been installed so im going to return it. Got the Edelbrock with the 6061.
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Nov 18, 2011
#9
  • Nov 18, 2011
  • #9
devinmb2007 said:
OK, you guys talked me into it. The other intake hasn't been installed so im going to return it. Got the Edelbrock with the 6061.
Click to expand...

good call!!!
 

Stumbaugh

Member
May 13, 2010
903
13
19
Russellville, Ar
Nov 18, 2011
#10
  • Nov 18, 2011
  • #10
Nothing wrong with the A1000 combo at all. I know plenty of people running them. If you plan on driving the car a lot, you might want to look into a billet fuel pump controller. It was ease the load on the fuel pump. Returnless is the only way to go!!!!!

And yes, good call on the intake. You will not be dissapointed!!!
 

nine2oneGT

Member
Apr 13, 2008
94
2
9
Austin, TX
Nov 18, 2011
#11
  • Nov 18, 2011
  • #11
Stumbaugh said:
Nothing wrong with the A1000 combo at all. I know plenty of people running them. If you plan on driving the car a lot, you might want to look into a billet fuel pump controller. It was ease the load on the fuel pump. Returnless is the only way to go!!!!!

And yes, good call on the intake. You will not be dissapointed!!!
Click to expand...

The system i have has a return. I dont need a controller in that case do I?
 

Stumbaugh

Member
May 13, 2010
903
13
19
Russellville, Ar
Nov 19, 2011
#12
  • Nov 19, 2011
  • #12
It doesn't matter if it's a return or returnless. It can benefit from a controller. The controller works as a huge relay. You should invest in one if you plan on street driving it much.
 
R

rconaway

Founding Member
Nov 11, 1999
1,415
3
39
Phoenix, Az.
Nov 20, 2011
#13
  • Nov 20, 2011
  • #13
I would also dump the A1000. Not only didn't it keep up with the power when I went over 500hp, I also went through 3 of them. However, I've done a return system conversion. In Arizona they faded and failed. I've changed over to dual Walbro 255's and haven't had a problem since.
 

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Nov 20, 2011
#14
  • Nov 20, 2011
  • #14
edelbrock FTW!!

 

Attachments

  • DSCN1328.webp
    64.3 KB · Views: 206
Reactions: 2vNotch

Kornnut

Founding Member
Nov 25, 2000
1,999
48
108
Tulsa
Nov 20, 2011
#15
  • Nov 20, 2011
  • #15
98COBRA281 said:
edelbrock FTW!!

Click to expand...

 

Attachments

  • DSCN1328.webp
    64.3 KB · Views: 391

Stumbaugh

Member
May 13, 2010
903
13
19
Russellville, Ar
Nov 21, 2011
#16
  • Nov 21, 2011
  • #16
rconaway said:
I would also dump the A1000. Not only didn't it keep up with the power when I went over 500hp, I also went through 3 of them. However, I've done a return system conversion. In Arizona they faded and failed. I've changed over to dual Walbro 255's and haven't had a problem since.
Click to expand...

If your's was not keeping up at 500hp, then you had something wrong. I know of 5 people off the top of my head that are making over 800rwhp using the A1000's, and they are working flawlessly.

As I said before, if you put a fuel pump controller on it, it will not burn up.
 
R

rconaway

Founding Member
Nov 11, 1999
1,415
3
39
Phoenix, Az.
Nov 21, 2011
#17
  • Nov 21, 2011
  • #17
Can't tell you anything more than I will sell you the unit I still have that doesn't have 10 hours on it. I drive 60 miles and I'm stranded when the pump overheats and can't pump. I gave up when I munched an engine from fuel starvation and went to the Walbros.
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Nov 21, 2011
#18
  • Nov 21, 2011
  • #18
rconaway said:
I would also dump the A1000. Not only didn't it keep up with the power when I went over 500hp, I also went through 3 of them. However, I've done a return system conversion. In Arizona they faded and failed. I've changed over to dual Walbro 255's and haven't had a problem since.
Click to expand...

 

tank_567

Active Member
Mar 19, 2007
731
26
29
Raleigh, Nc
Nov 21, 2011
#19
  • Nov 21, 2011
  • #19
98COBRA281 said:
edelbrock FTW!!
Click to expand...

X2

View attachment 164912
 

nine2oneGT

Member
Apr 13, 2008
94
2
9
Austin, TX
Nov 21, 2011
#20
  • Nov 21, 2011
  • #20
Idk guys, I already spent the money on the fuel system, and tossed my fuel lines. I am going to be eventually putting out a lot of power so im going to stick with aeromotive. Ill just have to save up for the controller. Any way a really good tuner could do what that controller is doing?

I went down to do a few things on the car while my Uncle's guys are waiting on the intake. Didnt get to do much but change over a few of the pullies.

View attachment 164910
View attachment 164911
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Fox Build ideas for the 'Hudson Heap' (87 GT)
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Sep 19, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 27, 2023
MadSquirrelTech
C
Progress Thread 2004 Comp Orange GT
  • ctandc
  • Jun 26, 2023
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
56
Views
5K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
ctandc
C
Progress Thread Daily Driver.... 89 GT - Front suspension rebuild
  • TIGGER
  • Apr 4, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 8 9 10
Replies
186
Views
27K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2024
TIGGER
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?