• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

5.0 Mustang-this months Q&A????

  • Thread starter Thread starter 88-378
  • Start date Start date Aug 9, 2010
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Aug 10, 2010
#21
  • Aug 10, 2010
  • #21
cjrpony said:
I got both magazines for years and I have stacks of them in the garage. I quit getting them in 2004 because it seemed like the same articles over and over again. And I quit getting Car Craft because it was really Chevy Craft.
Click to expand...

Car Craft is just kind of a low end mag, anyway. Their tech is usually legit, but you can tell they are on a budget making that magazine. Must be why it's always Chevy crap, haha.
 

Riceslayer302.0

New Member
Jul 24, 2010
123
1
0
connecticut
Aug 10, 2010
#22
  • Aug 10, 2010
  • #22
NikwoaC said:
Eh, I'd agree with what they said. A 331 with heads that flow 300+ CFM intake, 220+ exhaust, a properly matched cam with no less than .550 lift, a decent size intake like a Eddie RPM 2, SysteMax, or TrickFlow R, 10:1+ CR, and with all the supporting goodies should make peak HP around 63-6500 RPM and achieve 450 in theory.
Click to expand...

sounds like my 331 and it only made 350/373 on the dyno, but i had junk exhaust
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Aug 10, 2010
#23
  • Aug 10, 2010
  • #23
Riceslayer302.0 said:
sounds like my 331 and it only made 350/373 on the dyno, but i had junk exhaust
Click to expand...

Was it tuned and where did it make peak hp?
 

88-378

Member
Aug 10, 2007
14
2
16
Alpharetta, GA
Aug 11, 2010
#24
  • Aug 11, 2010
  • #24
90lxcoupe said:
YES it is that easy, bolt a CNC'd or even FAC trick flow head with good supporting parts and you will get very close to that number give or take 10 hp, its been done many times, just cause your motor didnt do it dosent mean that you can discredit what others have achieved. You could do it with a better cylinder head and better planned out parts


With a solid roller it should make more like 500+hp



then why did you use an off the shelf cam and are still running a cobra lower?
Click to expand...

I don't want to get into a pissing match. I am not complaining about my set-up! I simply stated 450 is not easy and it ain't. the article sounds as if you simply take a 331, throw some heads on it and your done.

Take some of these cars that you say have well over 450, put them on a "real" dyno and let's see what happens! BTW, with a little massaging, I can get there but then...it wasn't "easy"!
 

88-378

Member
Aug 10, 2007
14
2
16
Alpharetta, GA
Aug 11, 2010
#25
  • Aug 11, 2010
  • #25
Riceslayer302.0 said:
sounds like my 331 and it only made 350/373 on the dyno, but i had junk exhaust
Click to expand...

Those are great numbers!!
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Aug 11, 2010
#26
  • Aug 11, 2010
  • #26
88-378 said:
I don't want to get into a pissing match. I am not complaining about my set-up! I simply stated 450 is not easy and it ain't. the article sounds as if you simply take a 331, throw some heads on it and your done.

Take some of these cars that you say have well over 450, put them on a "real" dyno and let's see what happens! BTW, with a little massaging, I can get there but then...it wasn't "easy"!
Click to expand...

You obv do want to get into a pissing match cause people keep giving you examples and you keep saying that it cant be done. If you do things right the first time it is EASY, if you build a motor once, dont make the numbers, then buy parts again to make more power then yes, thats the HARD way. 331ci, good set of 205cc heads, victor5.0 or TFS R intake and a custom cam and its done.

My motor made(a little bigger than a 331) 440hp with TFS cnc'd 205's a 282XR cam and a dual plane with a spare untuned to my motor carburator. It made 440 HP at 5900 rpms, i wasnt concerned about the power, i put it on an engine dyno to break it in and make sure nothing was leaking, i was giving up alot of power with the dual plane, and my motor is only 14 CI smaller then a 331.

Here is your "450"hp 331 with a solid cam that is revving to 7000+rpms. In reality its a 331 that peaks at 7300rpms and makes 540hp with NO EXOTIC PARTS, which to me makes it pretty easy, you can believe it or not, but its been done.

http://www.stangnet.com/mustang-forums/803357-awesome-article-engine-masters-built-331-a.html
 

88-378

Member
Aug 10, 2007
14
2
16
Alpharetta, GA
Aug 11, 2010
#27
  • Aug 11, 2010
  • #27
90lxcoupe said:
You obv do want to get into a pissing match cause people keep giving you examples and you keep saying that it cant be done. If you do things right the first time it is EASY, if you build a motor once, dont make the numbers, then buy parts again to make more power then yes, thats the HARD way. 331ci, good set of 205cc heads, victor5.0 or TFS R intake and a custom cam and its done.

My motor made(a little bigger than a 331) 440hp with TFS cnc'd 205's a 282XR cam and a dual plane with a spare untuned to my motor carburator. It made 440 HP at 5900 rpms, i wasnt concerned about the power, i put it on an engine dyno to break it in and make sure nothing was leaking, i was giving up alot of power with the dual plane, and my motor is only 14 CI smaller then a 331.

Here is your "450"hp 331 with a solid cam that is revving to 7000+rpms. In reality its a 331 that peaks at 7300rpms and makes 540hp with NO EXOTIC PARTS, which to me makes it pretty easy, you can believe it or not, but its been done.

http://www.stangnet.com/mustang-forums/803357-awesome-article-engine-masters-built-331-a.html
Click to expand...

A carbed 331 is a different animal entirely. And i already stated that you can get to it by revving to 7K. And I beleive i did mine right the first time. I wasn't looking for "all" the power in the world. what i wanted was torque for the street.

My whole point was how they positioned the answer to the question in the article. That's it....

I am sure i can find a dyno that will give me the numbers to brag. I prefer real world results! And if you think i am full of it, call Brad Brand, Tony Mamo, or Mike Lewis! BTW, my setup dyno'd 325hp/330tq at the rear wheels.

I am really not trying to argue with anyone. bottom line it is not easy to make those numbers the way they told it in that article.
 
M

mwood

Member
May 9, 2008
177
0
16
Aug 11, 2010
#28
  • Aug 11, 2010
  • #28
I really like this thread because it exposes the power given up by setups without the right parts. The only real debate I see shaping up is whether real power can be had with fuel injection without a power adder. Someone has to say "YES!!!". FI can make make power NA, but only with the right parts, that ain't a cobra intake or any intake with that nasty 180 degree turn.
 

MAC'n89Blckstng

Active Member
Jun 11, 2003
1,012
4
36
NJ
Aug 11, 2010
#29
  • Aug 11, 2010
  • #29
This needs to be seen by everyone in this thread!

Elvira 331 Project Dyno - Mustangs & Fords Magazine
 

88-378

Member
Aug 10, 2007
14
2
16
Alpharetta, GA
Aug 11, 2010
#30
  • Aug 11, 2010
  • #30
MAC'n89Blckstng said:
This needs to be seen by everyone in this thread!

Elvira 331 Project Dyno - Mustangs & Fords Magazine
Click to expand...

Great article. I would have loved to carb mine. But, I wanted to keep it simple so that it can be put back to stock relatively easy!
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Aug 11, 2010
#31
  • Aug 11, 2010
  • #31
mwood said:
I really like this thread because it exposes the power given up by setups without the right parts. The only real debate I see shaping up is whether real power can be had with fuel injection without a power adder. Someone has to say "YES!!!". FI can make make power NA, but only with the right parts, that ain't a cobra intake or any intake with that nasty 180 degree turn.
Click to expand...

Well said! There are EFI intakes that can make ludicrous power though, like the TF "R" or the Eddie Victor. Carb style intakes converted to EFI are a good way to make power, too, of course.
 

88-378

Member
Aug 10, 2007
14
2
16
Alpharetta, GA
Aug 11, 2010
#32
  • Aug 11, 2010
  • #32
NikwoaC said:
Well said! There are EFI intakes that can make ludicrous power though, like the TF "R" or the Eddie Victor. Carb style intakes converted to EFI are a good way to make power, too, of course.
Click to expand...

Quick question tho, would a TF R or Eddie Vic sacrifice torque? I do know you can rev the crap out of it with those, but at what expense?
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Aug 11, 2010
#33
  • Aug 11, 2010
  • #33
88-378 said:
Quick question tho, would a TF R or Eddie Vic sacrifice torque? I do know you can rev the crap out of it with those, but at what expense?
Click to expand...

If you mismatch parts, maybe, but if done right, no. It will just shift the torque curve higher in the RPMs and make pore power.

How much torque an engine makes is heavily dependent on displacement, compression ratio, and volumetric efficiency. WHERE it makes peak torque depends on WHERE VE is at peak. A smaller intake will be at its best VE at a lower RPM, while a larger intake will achieve its best VE at higher RPM.

Perfect example in this MM&FF article. At one point they switch from a GT-40 intake to a Holley SysteMax, with no other changes. The Holley made only 2 ft-lb more torque at peak, but shifted the torque curve upwards about 700 rpm, resulting in a gain of 41 hp!

Ford Mustang 5.0L Engine Horsepower Modifications - Muscle Mustangs & Fast Fords
 

Kdubslugga

Active Member
Jun 7, 2003
1,515
3
38
Akron, OH
Aug 11, 2010
#34
  • Aug 11, 2010
  • #34
I say its def possible. I should be making about 525-530 at the wheels with proper fuel "Im 510 now at 5500 rpm" Thats roughly 600 crank probably a little less. take out the 14lbs of boost = 140 HP theres 460 HP. And im only at 9:25:1 compression so yeah def possible!!!!
 

Cobra912

Active Member
May 1, 2005
1,777
11
39
Wish I was anywhere but here
Aug 12, 2010
#35
  • Aug 12, 2010
  • #35
I should have just built a 408 instead of a 331
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Aug 12, 2010
#36
  • Aug 12, 2010
  • #36
Kdubslugga said:
I say its def possible. I should be making about 525-530 at the wheels with proper fuel "Im 510 now at 5500 rpm" Thats roughly 600 crank probably a little less. take out the 14lbs of boost = 140 HP theres 460 HP. And im only at 9:25:1 compression so yeah def possible!!!!
Click to expand...

Huh? 14lbs of boost is worth a little more than 140 hp.
 

88-378

Member
Aug 10, 2007
14
2
16
Alpharetta, GA
Aug 12, 2010
#37
  • Aug 12, 2010
  • #37
Cobra912 said:
I should have just built a 408 instead of a 331
Click to expand...

From someone who runs 10's? LOL
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Aug 12, 2010
#38
  • Aug 12, 2010
  • #38
88-378 said:
Quick question tho, would a TF R or Eddie Vic sacrifice torque? I do know you can rev the crap out of it with those, but at what expense?
Click to expand...

Nope, like nic said with the right cam/heads the "bigger" intakes dont give up anything down low. I think the reason my motor works so well with so called high RPM parts is because the torque curve is wide and pretty flat. The cam is a huge part of it, i wish i went custom but i am also happy with what i have.

I think the reason my cam works well is the LSA, it is 114 degrees and i have read that the narrower the LSA the more peaky the motor will be, and the wider lobe separation makes for better drivability and a wider powerband. Alot of guys just look for a peak number but how the motor gets to its peak is way more important than how much power it makes.
 

88-378

Member
Aug 10, 2007
14
2
16
Alpharetta, GA
Aug 12, 2010
#39
  • Aug 12, 2010
  • #39
90lxcoupe said:
Nope, like nic said with the right cam/heads the "bigger" intakes dont give up anything down low. I think the reason my motor works so well with so called high RPM parts is because the torque curve is wide and pretty flat. The cam is a huge part of it, i wish i went custom but i am also happy with what i have.

I think the reason my cam works well is the LSA, it is 114 degrees and i have read that the narrower the LSA the more peaky the motor will be, and the wider lobe separation makes for better drivability and a wider powerband. Alot of guys just look for a peak number but how the motor gets to its peak is way more important than how much power it makes.
Click to expand...

Brad said i needed a little more duration for my setup. But, i love it on the street! I peak right around 5,400
 

Kdubslugga

Active Member
Jun 7, 2003
1,515
3
38
Akron, OH
Aug 12, 2010
#40
  • Aug 12, 2010
  • #40
NikwoaC said:
Huh? 14lbs of boost is worth a little more than 140 hp.
Click to expand...

Ive always heard 10 HP for every 1lb of boost... I dunno maybe Im wrong, wouldnt be the first time!!!! Im with the guy who said just put a 408 in it!!
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Need some camshaft guru advice on power loss from supercharger to nitrous
  • TTSaleen
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
676
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 29, 2025
revhead347
Help with Engine Build
  • 93gtmustang
  • Nov 13, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
731
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 17, 2024
AeroCoupe
S
5.0 Rebuild
  • smittys7up
  • Nov 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
576
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 20, 2025
Noobz347
T
Help with a 95 5L crank no start
  • TheBubbaJoe
  • Nov 4, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
452
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Nov 5, 2025
AeroCoupe
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?