Build Thread '83 T-top Coupe - Welding Holes in My Rear

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is going to piss mike off but I just need to say it....

For the kind of money you're putting into this v6, you know you could have just found a good explorer motor, thrown a cam in it and put a used v3 kit on it and exceeded those power goals for less hassle and money right? I know it wouldn't be "unique" but I thought a big reason why you were going the v6 route was cause you could get the tbird motor running cheap, instead of just being "unique for unique's sake".
Cheap is out when it comes to the drivetrain.

When this was initially intended to be my son’s car, cheap was written all over it. Lol.

It’s my car now. I don’t mind doing cheap on fixing taillights and sht like that. They can be fixed, so why not fix them?

At 55, I’m not going to have a huge amount more opportunities to do what I want to do (especially if my wife finds out).

The sc engine really is to keep me from going fruit loops with this fairly rare car. I have a tendency to not know when to stop.

This engine has limits, just what I needed. Plus it is kind of fun doing something a little different.
 
Well Dave? @Davedacarpainter
Did you do the S/C engine for the sake of individuality, or because they were all out of cheap assed belly buttons the day you made your choice?;)
Can't say it's total individuality, not like yours at least. I have seen five others online that have done/are doing the same.

It's one of the more difficult swaps, I kind of like that.

Plus I haven’t seen another one that really looks btchin'. I want everyone to say, "Wow!" when I open the hood, and then when I close it and take someone for a spin they'll say,"Wow!" when I hammer it.

There's so much cluttered and ugly about this engine that I'm really looking forward to making it not just good looking, but very functional.
 
Last edited:
Stock, its simply a 5.0 liter stand in engine that makes an Explorer GT40P 5 liter or 1993 SVT Cobra like performance. You don't think Ford would ever be dumb enough to take away Small Block Ford V8 supremacy by making the Super Coupe 3.8 liter harder, faster and more bad a$$ than a Mod 4.6, 5.0 or whatever.

It was built for cost, quietness, emissions, then just enough performance to spike sales. Vey much like the first 351 Cleveland.

Unlike that engine, Ford tankfully didn't "cheap out" on the thinwall engine block.

Ford did restrict the basic sizes of the ducting, but it didn't have to support 400 hp. Only 210 factory, but well over 240 actual.

The systems un bottled quickly go from the 242 hp net flywheel and 332 lb-ft any stock 5 speed 1989-1990 can make to 290 and 420 lb-ft real quick with just the stock parts below in this picture.

restricted_stock_sc3800_system.webp


That's what really gets me excited about the potential gains....the M90 is so restrictive, and no one un bottles the potential of an M112 on this engine. Although, I'm not sure the M112 is where the aftermarket would have ever gone with an engine so hard to understand.

The aftermarket does things to avoid re CARBing the engine, so an MPX isn't going to cause issues. The focus has always been stock up grades.

From this

Oval_m90.webp



to this

mpx_m90_001.webp


This stuff is a Quantum Leap in power and torque, so M112's haven't been an item of interest.

Great, sexy looking tube upgrades have been lacking too. In a Fox, the real gurus have done the work in the garage, like Area 51 Aliens, and you don't see the truly excellent systems on line.

unrestricted_unstock_sc3800_system.webp


The Eaton Blown Essex 90 is simply a scary MF of an engine, and if Ford did one thing right, it was the engine block. The ducting, well, that requires its own kind of art to update.

A stock SuperCoupe has the makings of pure crazy coolness. No one really "gets" how progressive Ford was with the MN12 SC. Its a landmark of smart potential.

To make its private parts, Sexy Parts, that's artistry.

Dave, you've seen the future. Enjoy yourself, and follow your own path.
 
If we're honest with ourselves, the internal emotional struggle of every car guy is driving something that's different than everyone else VS driving something that's faster than everyone else. I would argue that the former is born out of creative self expression and the latter is nothing more than primal ego. I think both are essential to the survival of our hobby, but in my experience it seems like the guys who are more focused on doing things a little different are the ones who have the most fun and end up more satisfied with their work.

So in a nutshell Dave, I fully support this full tilt 4.2 build. It's going to be badass!
 
If we're honest with ourselves, the internal emotional struggle of every car guy is driving something that's different than everyone else VS driving something that's faster than everyone else. I would argue that the former is born out of creative self expression and the latter is nothing more than primal ego. I think both are essential to the survival of our hobby, but in my experience it seems like the guys who are more focused on doing things a little different are the ones who have the most fun and end up more satisfied with their work.

So in a nutshell Dave, I fully support this full tilt 4.2 build. It's going to be badass!
For once, I don't have to say another word.:cool:
 
  • Like
Reactions: stangboy
Sorry no new updates guys, I spent the weekend in bed. Sick as a dog.

I’ll have to work on my son’s car tonight if I feel up to doing anything.

I felt so sick that I didn’t even drink any alcohol!:eek:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Davedacarpainter
Status
Not open for further replies.