• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

clue me in on the gt40 stuff

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lawbreaker5.0
  • Start date Start date Sep 23, 2009
L

Lawbreaker5.0

Member
Feb 20, 2009
543
2
18
Texas
Sep 23, 2009
#1
  • Sep 23, 2009
  • #1
What years are the better heads? 97.5 and up?

i know there are gt40's and gt40p's right?

are the p's better?

Which heads need the special exhuast to mount up?

Also what year intake's too? should i be searching for uppers and lowers?

i remember hearing explorer upper and cobra lower


i have the trickflow stuff so this info is for a friend

thanks guys
 

5.0Torx

Active Member
Dec 30, 2007
252
3
29
Sep 23, 2009
#2
  • Sep 23, 2009
  • #2
I really hope this doesnt turn into another 15 page battle between non-p enthusiasts vs. p enthusiasts.

Do a search. I did my entire p head swap and only posted 2 or 3 threads asking way more technical info than this. The basic info youre looking for is all in the search threads.
 

tannerc91gt

This last 25% is foreign territory at this point
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
4,392
2,967
234
Indiana
Sep 23, 2009
#3
  • Sep 23, 2009
  • #3
Gt40s require no exahust change
ps require p specific headers
explorer intakes are gt40 intakes
p heads bump compression .5 and have a smaller combustion chamber I believe.

If you want more info do a search. It's all bee. Asked a thousand times
 

90notch_5.0

Member
Oct 25, 2007
92
1
9
Sep 23, 2009
#4
  • Sep 23, 2009
  • #4
I think this will help you a lot
Anything/Everything GT40P - Corral Forums
 
L

Lawbreaker5.0

Member
Feb 20, 2009
543
2
18
Texas
Sep 23, 2009
#5
  • Sep 23, 2009
  • #5
90notch_5.0 said:
I think this will help you a lot
Anything/Everything GT40P - Corral Forums
Click to expand...

thanks, this is what i was looking for.
 
M

Makdaddymac

New Member
May 28, 2005
323
1
0
orlando
Sep 23, 2009
#6
  • Sep 23, 2009
  • #6
let me clue you in if you are considering gt40 upgrades.....dont! other top end kits/combos will yield more power. i wish i did some afr's and a better intake my self, but all my motor mod money is spent and although my gt40 combo pulls ok, my car is not fast by todays standards.....i am guessing here but i would hope that my car can hang with /beat any "stock gt" including the new ones, but after a couple mods from a 99+ gt idk if my car would even contend......i would not do gt40 setup again, if i ever do a motor upgrade...
 
L

Lawbreaker5.0

Member
Feb 20, 2009
543
2
18
Texas
Sep 23, 2009
#7
  • Sep 23, 2009
  • #7
Makdaddymac said:
let me clue you in if you are considering gt40 upgrades.....dont! other top end kits/combos will yield more power. i wish i did some afr's and a better intake my self, but all my motor mod money is spent and although my gt40 combo pulls ok, my car is not fast by todays standards.....i am guessing here but i would hope that my car can hang with /beat any "stock gt" including the new ones, but after a couple mods from a 99+ gt idk if my car would even contend......i would not do gt40 setup again, if i ever do a motor upgrade...
Click to expand...

do you have any track times? or dyno numbers?

i just read on the corral link above that some guy pulled a 12.04 on p heads/intake and stock ho cam

i plan on building a 347, but all my friends are telling me that it'll rip my convertable to threads. so i don't know
 

RYC CUKR

Founding Member
May 19, 2002
1,437
1
38
Orlando
Sep 23, 2009
#8
  • Sep 23, 2009
  • #8
If you are going to do a 347 I would not opt for the gt40s. Just not enough head for the displacement.

They are decent heads if you can get them at a good price.

Just keep in mind that with the P heads you need to factor in swapping out the valve springs. The explorer springs won't handle even an HO cam.
 
L

Lawbreaker5.0

Member
Feb 20, 2009
543
2
18
Texas
Sep 24, 2009
#9
  • Sep 24, 2009
  • #9
RYC CUKR said:
If you are going to do a 347 I would not opt for the gt40s. Just not enough head for the displacement.

They are decent heads if you can get them at a good price.

Just keep in mind that with the P heads you need to factor in swapping out the valve springs. The explorer springs won't handle even an HO cam.
Click to expand...

sorry, i didn't clarify that correctly.

The info on the gt40 heads is for my friend and i told him to get the gt40p heads and swap out cam and springs for best performance.

i have the whole tfs top end on my car at the moment.

but i plan on building a nice 347, and going with some afr 185's or some trickflow fast as cast heads, but everyone says don't do it due to the fact that i have a vert and would twist like a mofo.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
732
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
S
5.0 Rebuild
  • smittys7up
  • Nov 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
574
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 20, 2025
Noobz347
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
819
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
S
Progress Thread severe97's Project Thread!
  • severe97
  • Jan 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
47
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 1, 2025
severe97
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?