• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

EFI vs Carb

  • Thread starter Thread starter 95Vert
  • Start date Start date Sep 20, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Sep 20, 2006
#1
  • Sep 20, 2006
  • #1
I was talking to a local guy and was telling him that my goal would be to put down between 500-600 hp/tq to the wheels in an n/a engine. He said he could do it with the right parts and asked me to consider going carb, he said it was less crap to work with. What you guys think? I'm thinking of a 393 stroker.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Sep 20, 2006
#2
  • Sep 20, 2006
  • #2
Go bigger than 393 and even with EFI, 500rwhp + is cake on pump gas.
 
Y

yellow1995Cobra

New Member
Dec 23, 2002
2,959
2
0
Massachusetts
Sep 20, 2006
#3
  • Sep 20, 2006
  • #3
how often u drive the car?

I put down 438/476 with a 418.. this was on the first tune. I had some issues with my CAI that i was going to fix and go back. Hopeing for a bit more power. I had a realitively mild hyd roller cam. Im sure i could have made alot more power with a solid roller and spining the motor over 6k.

This was EFI... I wouldnt go carb if you like driving your car on the street. I really dont see any benefit to going carb. For me i like my car to start right up, idle steady and so on.

But everyone is different. What bothers me may not bother you. Do alot of research before you make your decision. Alot of people think its "Cheaper" to go carb, but really look into it cause going carb and doing it the right way will probably equal the money you will spend going EFI with a tune. Plus you get to avoid the head aches of running new fuel lines and dealing with the fuel tank.

And i agree with green. You might as well go as big as you can....
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Sep 20, 2006
#4
  • Sep 20, 2006
  • #4
Please elaborate. The reason I'm asking is cause I've seen several with a lot of cubes putting down the same amount of hp/tq as the cubic inches they have. 418ci putting out 4xx hp/tq.

FYI, it won't be a daily driver but I do want a/c & p/s and to be able to drive it on cruises and things like that.
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Sep 20, 2006
#5
  • Sep 20, 2006
  • #5
I don't want to go too big. If I can pull out these numbers from a 347, I would, but I realize that I would be giving up driveablity with lower cubes due to higher compression and a more radical cam. So 418-393 stroker sounds about right.

How much power you think you can get out with your combo Yellow?
 

Blackened302

Active Member
Jul 21, 2005
1,439
0
36
South TX
Sep 20, 2006
#6
  • Sep 20, 2006
  • #6
408 stroker
 
Y

yellow1995Cobra

New Member
Dec 23, 2002
2,959
2
0
Massachusetts
Sep 20, 2006
#7
  • Sep 20, 2006
  • #7
95Vert said:
I don't want to go too big. If I can pull out these numbers from a 347, I would, but I realize that I would be giving up driveablity with lower cubes due to higher compression and a more radical cam. So 418-393 stroker sounds about right.

How much power you think you can get out with your combo Yellow?
Click to expand...


Im not sure what you want me to elborate on. But my combo was : FTI cam, afr225's, trickflow box intake, kooks 1-7/8 headers to 3 inch x pipe, 80 or 85mm tbody (cant remember), 42lb injectors, 255 intank pump. Had a local guy tune it.. The drivability was great..

Check out low 5.0's combo, he has all the same stuff i had except i believe his FTI cam was a bit more aggressive and he has a victor 5.8 intake instead of the trickflow i had.

It isnt cheap to build one of these setups, thats for sure! I believe the heads alone were 2k+ from ED C.

Anymore questions that ask.

Oh and you can easily make 500rwhp, just depends on how you want the drivabilty to be and to what rpms you want to spin the motor. I was making peak hp around 5500.
 

AznStanger3v

Active Member
Aug 11, 2003
2,026
0
47
Northern VA
Sep 20, 2006
#8
  • Sep 20, 2006
  • #8
stay efi. the end
 
9

95_StangGT

New Member
Sep 14, 2006
27
0
0
Sep 21, 2006
#9
  • Sep 21, 2006
  • #9
Grn92LX said:
Go bigger than 393 and even with EFI, 500rwhp + is cake on pump gas.
Click to expand...
BULL**** ... 500 RWH is NOT attainable on pump gas. Even with all the engine mods in the world and a blower ... not happening.
For that kind of power you will need to dump the EFI, and go with a high compression setup running a 4 BBL carb.
500 RWH will require at least 600 - 625 HP at the crank. Forget about getting that with EFI and pump gas.
 

1slow95

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
1,797
3
48
ohio
Sep 21, 2006
#10
  • Sep 21, 2006
  • #10
95_StangGT said:
BULL**** ... 500 RWH is NOT attainable on pump gas. Even with all the engine mods in the world and a blower ... not happening.
For that kind of power you will need to dump the EFI, and go with a high compression setup running a 4 BBL carb.
500 RWH will require at least 600 - 625 HP at the crank. Forget about getting that with EFI and pump gas.
Click to expand...

If that wasn't a sarcastic post, then you're an idiot.

I would go with the EFI Spyder intake on a 427. With the right heads and cam you can make 500+ easy.
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Sep 21, 2006
#11
  • Sep 21, 2006
  • #11
+1 on the efi

the problem with making 500 at the wheels with a 347 is that a stock block probably won't last very long. people usually say 450-500 flywheel is around the max of what a stock block can handle reliably.

you could even hit 500 with a 351, but it would have to be pretty agressive.

i was looking at 393s mainly because chp has a 393 short block for $2199. the 408/427s cost more.

or you can build your own 393 short block with a roller block for about $1800, or less if you can find a block and get it machined for less than $900. Allen motorsports (ebay) sells prepped 351 blocks for $595 ($85 ship) with roller conversion for $200 more. Stage 3 sells 393 kits for $900 on ebay.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Sep 21, 2006
#12
  • Sep 21, 2006
  • #12
The more power you try to press out (ex. 500rwhp)...the less driveability is a concern to you and possibly the less accessories you are running.
 
9

95_StangGT

New Member
Sep 14, 2006
27
0
0
Sep 22, 2006
#13
  • Sep 22, 2006
  • #13
Low-5.0 said:
If that wasn't a sarcastic post, then you're an idiot.

I would go with the EFI Spyder intake on a 427. With the right heads and cam you can make 500+ easy.
Click to expand...
No, it wasn't sarcastic, and I don't care what you're running ... 500+ RWH on pump gas isn't happenening.
 

mustangman9812

10 Year Member
Jan 14, 2004
661
6
49
Mars Hill, NC
Sep 22, 2006
#14
  • Sep 22, 2006
  • #14
+1 For Carb
 
F

fordtech28

Member
May 12, 2006
312
0
17
Riverside Cali.
Sep 22, 2006
#15
  • Sep 22, 2006
  • #15
95_StangGT said:
No, it wasn't sarcastic, and I don't care what you're running ... 500+ RWH on pump gas isn't happenening.
Click to expand...

Hey man sorry to burst your bubble but IT IS possible to run up to 500 RWH on pump gas it has to be the highest octane you can buy at a gas station there are people on these forums that have done that it all has to do with compression and tune .End of story
 

Therian

The Highlander
Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
0
1
0
Waterloo, Ontario
Sep 22, 2006
#16
  • Sep 22, 2006
  • #16
95_StangGT said:
BULL**** ... 500 RWH is NOT attainable on pump gas. Even with all the engine mods in the world and a blower ... not happening.
For that kind of power you will need to dump the EFI, and go with a high compression setup running a 4 BBL carb.
500 RWH will require at least 600 - 625 HP at the crank. Forget about getting that with EFI and pump gas.
Click to expand...

There are several people on here hitting mid 400s RWHP on the stock block...a 351 stroked would have NO problem hitting 500rwhp EFI.

it's all in the tune.
 

1slow95

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
1,797
3
48
ohio
Sep 22, 2006
#17
  • Sep 22, 2006
  • #17
95_StangGT said:
No, it wasn't sarcastic, and I don't care what you're running ... 500+ RWH on pump gas isn't happenening.
Click to expand...

Ever heard of the 03/04 Cobra? I've seen plenty of them right at 500RWHP on 93 octane. I've also seen a few 400+ cube windsors right at 500rwhp around these boards and the corral. I know there's a few guys on here that's made 500+ with a turbo/supercharger as well.
 

Black95GTS

Active Member
Jan 8, 2004
1,644
3
38
Marlborough, MA
Sep 22, 2006
#18
  • Sep 22, 2006
  • #18
95_StangGT said:
BULL**** ... 500 RWH is NOT attainable on pump gas. Even with all the engine mods in the world and a blower ... not happening.
For that kind of power you will need to dump the EFI, and go with a high compression setup running a 4 BBL carb.
500 RWH will require at least 600 - 625 HP at the crank. Forget about getting that with EFI and pump gas.
Click to expand...

 
F

fordtech28

Member
May 12, 2006
312
0
17
Riverside Cali.
Sep 22, 2006
#19
  • Sep 22, 2006
  • #19
he must be living under a rock to say its impossible to get 500 RWH on pump gas.A stroker motor plus a turbo or a superchager on can go over 500RWH with a good tune on pump gas .Ever heard of the GT500 500+ horses on pump gas.
 

4Jenna

Founding Member
Sep 12, 2001
4,326
6
69
AZ
Sep 22, 2006
#20
  • Sep 22, 2006
  • #20
Just build that 393 you want, and spray a 200 on it...you'll be laughing at 600rwtq
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
717
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
A
Carb swap question
  • AA wALtZ
  • Jul 27, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 8, 2024
General karthief
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?