I reverted back to the 0v=7.35.1 5v=22.39 wideband settings. And it felt alot smoother and more crisp.. Also seemed to be making the "proper corrections" on time. So ill still bump the "I" terms up 10 and see how it acts with the factory wideband voltage scale. The next ride i do. Im gonna save this tune then try a veal analyze live on very hard.. Take it for a hour or two ride and see what it says.Looks way better than the first drive thats for sure. Looks to me like the ego correction is still too slow, you will want to increase the I term by 10
so just to be clear ego correction in the datalogs... do the changes up mean ego correct (106)Plus 6% correction and the changes down ego correct remove (90) 10%? because the ego correction seems to be in the range of 106-90.. the whole rideLooks way better than the first drive thats for sure. Looks to me like the ego correction is still too slow, you will want to increase the I term by 10
Ok just wanted to make sure i was understanding it properly.. so ive got alot of cruise cells matchin the afr target.. and right now im tryin to figure out what to do about my idle when all the electrical loads are on the motor.. cause it was going good until the headlights fans and power inverter were all on... had a oscilating idle when stopped.. so now im reviewing datalogs tryin to figure out the best way to attack that problem lolRd yes that is how it works
Ok so adaptive/adder. Condition manual. Tps below 2% rpm 1300 load above 30% clt above 180 and delay 2 seconds.. .. So that curve i set for it to follow. That should work well? If it dont work this way. Im just gonna use cl pid and have it set valve. Rpms the same but taper from 19 18 17 16 15. Cause it worked great when i had it set up that wayyou have to choose manual activation OR CL activation.... setting it to manual with a[n]
rpm of 1300
load of 30
temp of 180
should get ya working
Ahh that i did not kno.. Ill try that then.. From lookin at the datalogs. Looks like my idle valve isnt high enough for hot starts. Maybe its time for me to do a chart and see where that should be adjusted too. Cause 18.8%pwm duty isnt holding hot starts at the proper idle.. Its more stable at around 25.1 as shown in the datalogs. I definitely have more work to get this rightyou can lower the activation time in manual all the way down to 0 seconds if needed... this makes it kick in right away
Tune to review?HAHA i got it.... now i had to make a few adjustments but after playing with a bunch of different numbers i got my revs holding with all loads on the motor.. fans lights i mean all the electrical loads. had to do some weird adjustments but it works.. does not idle up and down no more.. the numbers when you look at them they look messed LOL but it works. the end of this datalog is where its gonna stay i think..
heres my current tune,,, the numbers make no sense as numbers but they actually worked.. didnt drop or nothing it just kept idlingTune to review?
ahh i was waiting for you too tell me that it was too aggressive lol... im starting to realize that what looks good as numbers alot of the times doesnt work well for the engine.. alot of the settings when you look at the numbers its like.. nah that shouldnt work its all over the place. but in reality it works great.. kinda like 12345 doesnt work try 15243 and it does... if you get what i meanHonestly I just wanted to see, many ways to get the job done. If it works it works!
|Thread starter||Similar threads||Forum||Replies||Date|
|1||Car cranks but doesn't start. Used checklist, have fuel, spark, compression and timing||Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech||1|
|T||Foxbody Won't Start After 15-20 Minutes Of Being Used!!||Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech||20|
|8||What Year Did Ford Start Using A Better Sterio?||1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-||7|
|W||Used wrong key - now will not start||SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech||5|
|New tools you've started to use and now can't live without||1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-||55|