• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Help With Dumping Code's 98 Koer +

  • Thread starter Thread starter 88droptop5.0
  • Start date Start date Mar 7, 2015
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 7
Next
First Prev 2 of 7 Next Last

88droptop5.0

Member
Mar 4, 2015
135
8
18
NEPA
Mar 8, 2015
#21
  • Mar 8, 2015
  • #21
liljoe07 said:
You won't get a code 11 unless all codes are fixed. See if you have 5v between the two terminals on the ECT connector.
Click to expand...
Ok, I just checked my volts between the two ECT terminal plug ends with key off its 0 with key on its 4.66v.
I also checked my canister purge silinoid connectio ( not hooked up to anything as it sits when I got it ). Thats .03 with key off, with key on its 10.97v.
I just picked up an ATC sensor, I need to fish out the harness which has no sensor plugged into it. I'll check my volts, can I plug the sensor in and lay it on my manifold for the time being?
 

liljoe07

5 Year Member
Feb 18, 2009
1,622
363
124
Cartersville,Ga
Mar 8, 2015
#22
  • Mar 8, 2015
  • #22
So everything seems fine wiring wise. Have you cleared the codes any?
 

88droptop5.0

Member
Mar 4, 2015
135
8
18
NEPA
Mar 8, 2015
#23
  • Mar 8, 2015
  • #23
liljoe07 said:
So everything seems fine wiring wise. Have you cleared the codes any?
Click to expand...
I am trying to get to my ATC sensor harness to at least plug in a sensor. It looks like there is nothing plugged into it.
How do I clear coads? Do you mean if I plug my code scanner in to see if some coded go away. Or is there a actual prosses for clearing coads?
Thanks..
 

liljoe07

5 Year Member
Feb 18, 2009
1,622
363
124
Cartersville,Ga
Mar 8, 2015
#24
  • Mar 8, 2015
  • #24
Unplug the battery for about 10 minutes. Should clear the codes. Then run the KOEO codes.
 

88droptop5.0

Member
Mar 4, 2015
135
8
18
NEPA
Mar 8, 2015
#25
  • Mar 8, 2015
  • #25
liljoe07 said:
Unplug the battery for about 10 minutes. Should clear the codes. Then run the KOEO codes.
Click to expand...
Ok. I'll unhook my battery and check in about 10/20 min..
I'll report back with what I find, thank you
 

88droptop5.0

Member
Mar 4, 2015
135
8
18
NEPA
Mar 8, 2015
#26
  • Mar 8, 2015
  • #26
Ok I unhooked my battery for a while, hooked up my new ECT sensor. I fished out my empty ACT harness and plugged in a new sensor.
I ran a koeo test and got a 22, 67, 81, 85. In that order...followed by what I think was a 11.
What next...
 

liljoe07

5 Year Member
Feb 18, 2009
1,622
363
124
Cartersville,Ga
Mar 8, 2015
#27
  • Mar 8, 2015
  • #27
Code 22 is the issue. I may have forgotten. Is this a speed density car or mass air?
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,811
234
Dublin GA
Mar 8, 2015
#28
  • Mar 8, 2015
  • #28
MAP/BARO sensor operation and code 22

Revised 14-Nov-2014 to add wire colors for frequency & voltage testing and engine sensor wiring diagrams.

On a Speed Density car, the MAP/BARO sensor is connected to the intake manifold and acts to sense the manifold pressure. Lower vacuum inside the intake manifold when combined with more throttle opening measured by the TPS means more airflow through the engine. As airflow increases, fuel flow through the injectors needs to increase to keep the air/fuel ratio where it needs to be. When manifold vacuum increases, the engine is either decelerating or idling, and it needs to reduce the fuel flow through the injectors.

On a Mass Air car, the MAP/BARO sensor vents to open air and actually senses the barometric pressure due to changes in weather and altitude. Its purpose is to set a baseline for the computer to know the barometric pressure. As barometric pressure decreases, it leans out the fuel flow to compensate for less oxygen in the air. When the barometric pressure rises, it increases to add fuel since there is more oxygen in the air. The fuel requirements decrease as altitude increases, since the atmospheric pressure decreases.

Disconnecting the MAP or BARO sensor will set code 22.

Misconnecting the BARO sensor to vacuum on a Mass Air car will cause the computer to lean out the fuel mixture.

Code 22 or 126 MAP (vacuum) or BARO signal out of range. The MAP or BARO sensor is pretty much the same sensor for both Mass Air & Speed Density cars. The main difference is where it is connected. Mass Air cars vent it to the atmosphere, while Speed Density cars connect it to the intake manifold vacuum. Its purpose is to help set a baseline for the air/fuel mixture by sensing changes in barometric pressure. The MAP or BAP sensor puts out a 5 volt square wave that changes frequency with variations in atmospheric pressure. The base is 154 HZ at 29.92" of mercury - dry sunny day at sea level, about 68-72 degrees. You need an oscilloscope or frequency meter to measure it. There a very few DVM’s with a price tag under $40 that will measure frequency, but there are some out there.

Map sensor wiring:
black/white - ground
orange/white or +5 volts power
white/red signal out.

Measure the +5 volt supply using the orange/white and black/white wires
Measure the signal using the black/white and white/red wires.

The MAP/BARO sensor is mounted on the firewall behind the upper manifold on 86-93 Mustangs.

Baro or MAP test using a real frequency meter - run the test key on, engine off. The noise from the ignition system will likely upset the frequency meter. I used a 10 x oscilloscope probe connected from the frequency meter to the MAP/BAP to reduce the jitter in the meter's readout. And oscilloscope is very useful if you have access to one or know of someone who does. With an oscilloscope, you can see the waveform and amplitude.

If it is defective, your air/fuel ratio will be off and the car’s performance & emissions will suffer

Some basic checks you can make to be sure that the sensor is getting power & ground:
Note that all resistance tests must be done with power off. Measuring resistance with a circuit powered on will give false readings and possibly damage the meter.
Check the resistance between the black/white wire on the MAP/BARO sensor and then the black/white wire on the EGR and the same wire on the TPS. It should be less than 1 ohm. Next check the resistance between the black/white wire and the negative battery cable. It should be less than 1.5 ohm.

The following power on check requires you to turn the ignition switch to the Run position.
Use a DVM to check for 5 volts on the orange/white wire. If it is missing, look for +5 volts at the orange/white wire on the TPS or EGR sensors. Use the black/white wire for the ground for the DVM.

Diagrams courtesy of Tmoss & Stang&2birds

Complete computer, actuator & sensor wiring diagram for 88-91 Mass Air Mustangs


Complete computer, actuator & sensor wiring diagram for 91-93 Mass Air Mustangs


See the following website for some help from Tmoss (diagram designer) & Stang&2Birds (website host) for help on 88-95 wiring Mustang FAQ - Wiring & Engine Info Everyone should bookmark this site.

Complete computer, actuator & sensor wiring diagram for 91-93 Mass Air Mustangs
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/91-93_5.0_EEC_Wiring_Diagram.gif

Complete computer, actuator & sensor wiring diagram for 88-91 Mass Air Mustangs
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/88-91_5.0_EEC_Wiring_Diagram.gif

Ignition switch wiring
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/IgnitionSwitchWiring.gif

Fuel, alternator, A/C and ignition wiring
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/fuel-alt-links-ign-ac.gif

O2 sensor wiring harness
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/mustangO2Harness.gif

Vacuum diagram 89-93 Mustangs
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/mustangFoxFordVacuumDiagram.jpg

HVAC vacuum diagram
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/Mustang_AC_heat_vacuum_controls.gif

TFI module differences & pin out
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/TFI_5.0_comparison.gif

Fuse box layout
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/MustangFuseBox.gif

87-92 power window wiring
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/mustang87-92 PowerWindowWiring.gif

93 power window wiring
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/mustang93PowerWindows.gif

T5 Cutaway showing T5 internal parts
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/5_Speed_Cutaway_Illustrated.jpg

Visual comparison of the Ford Fuel Injectors, picture by TMoss:
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/Ford_Injector_Guide.jpg
 
Reactions: 88droptop5.0

88droptop5.0

Member
Mar 4, 2015
135
8
18
NEPA
Mar 8, 2015
#29
  • Mar 8, 2015
  • #29
Ok, thanks guys. I believe its a speed density car. I'll give it a test.
Is this the part I'm looking for?
 

Attachments

  • 1425845906669353575838.webp
    58.7 KB · Views: 176

liljoe07

5 Year Member
Feb 18, 2009
1,622
363
124
Cartersville,Ga
Mar 8, 2015
#30
  • Mar 8, 2015
  • #30
Yes that is it.
 

88droptop5.0

Member
Mar 4, 2015
135
8
18
NEPA
Mar 8, 2015
#31
  • Mar 8, 2015
  • #31
liljoe07 said:
Yes that is it.
Click to expand...
Ok, thanks. I tested as mentioned above at the black/white and red/white (ming is orange/white) and got 5.02v at the harness. I don't have a oscallascop lol.
What's next? Replace the sensor, check vacume line.
Thanks, I wouldn't of gotten this far without your guys help...
 

liljoe07

5 Year Member
Feb 18, 2009
1,622
363
124
Cartersville,Ga
Mar 8, 2015
#32
  • Mar 8, 2015
  • #32
The odd part is that the code didn't show up in the KOER test. So that tells me that technically the signal wire( green wire) might be ok. I would probably check the resistance of that wire all the way to the computer. With both the sensor and computer unplugged.

If that checks out, then unless you want to spend the money on the correct tools to test it. I would just replace it. Generally, if the power to the sensor is good, and the signal wire is in good condition, there really isn't anything else it could be.
 

88droptop5.0

Member
Mar 4, 2015
135
8
18
NEPA
Mar 8, 2015
#33
  • Mar 8, 2015
  • #33
liljoe07 said:
The odd part is that the code didn't show up in the KOER test. So that tells me that technically the signal wire( green wire) might be ok. I would probably check the resistance of that wire all the way to the computer. With both the sensor and computer unplugged.

If that checks out, then unless you want to spend the money on the correct tools to test it. I would just replace it. Generally, if the power to the sensor is good, and the signal wire is in good condition, there really isn't anything else it could be.
Click to expand...
Ok, I'm testing the green wire from the map sensor to the computer plug connection, I'll report back with my findings.
 

88droptop5.0

Member
Mar 4, 2015
135
8
18
NEPA
Mar 8, 2015
#34
  • Mar 8, 2015
  • #34
Also there is a gas smell and seems on the rich side, but I'm not sure if that had anything to do with it. I'm testing the green wire now
 

88droptop5.0

Member
Mar 4, 2015
135
8
18
NEPA
Mar 8, 2015
#35
  • Mar 8, 2015
  • #35
I'm trying to get a reading but I am getting no resistance or really high resistance. Its pin # 45 on the computer harness right? And the green/black wire on my map harness, correct?
 

liljoe07

5 Year Member
Feb 18, 2009
1,622
363
124
Cartersville,Ga
Mar 8, 2015
#36
  • Mar 8, 2015
  • #36
That is correct. Make sure you are on the correct pin on the computer harness. Does that wire color match the wire on the map sensor?
 

88droptop5.0

Member
Mar 4, 2015
135
8
18
NEPA
Mar 8, 2015
#37
  • Mar 8, 2015
  • #37
Yes it matches green/black stripe. I'm getting the overload Ol simble,no ohm reading at all from #45 and green/black wire with my Fluke . sometimes it would show a really hi reading but I may of been hooked up incorrectly. I'll try again
 

88droptop5.0

Member
Mar 4, 2015
135
8
18
NEPA
Mar 8, 2015
#38
  • Mar 8, 2015
  • #38
I'm just getting the overload 0L symbol. No reading. It seems my green/black wire is at the end of my harness, by the bolt bottom . its green/black just like my map green black wire
 

88droptop5.0

Member
Mar 4, 2015
135
8
18
NEPA
Mar 8, 2015
#39
  • Mar 8, 2015
  • #39
Its the one I have the pin pointing to be n the close-up pic
 

Attachments

  • 1425862263096-725992775.webp
    31.3 KB · Views: 178
  • 14258624024681296261776.webp
    49.1 KB · Views: 175

liljoe07

5 Year Member
Feb 18, 2009
1,622
363
124
Cartersville,Ga
Mar 8, 2015
#40
  • Mar 8, 2015
  • #40
It should be about 5 spots from the side of the eec connector.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 7
Next
First Prev 2 of 7 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
2002 V6 3.8L Help Me
  • TheIncompetentMechanic
  • Apr 4, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
50
Views
679
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 12, 2026
TheIncompetentMechanic
T
A
Check Engine codes jumping around
  • azactor
  • Jan 9, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
164
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 10, 2026
gkomo
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
552
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
1
Electrical Headlight harness trouble
  • 1985fox
  • Apr 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
190
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 17, 2026
AeroCoupe
Engine 87 NA - Tune or no Tune needed?
  • R82148V
  • Sep 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
316
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 17, 2025
R82148V
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?