• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

New Dyno and 1/4 #'s

  • Thread starter Thread starter Venom351R
  • Start date Start date May 14, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
May 14, 2005
#21
  • May 14, 2005
  • #21
Killercanary said:
BTW- I'd stay FAR AWAY from used injectors unless you are sure they were in good working order and were just removed froma vehicle. If not, its more hassle than what its worth as I have seen a number of guys get bum injectors when buying used.
Click to expand...


Ive seen #42's for $260 new since the previous post of being lucky to find used ones for $300
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
May 14, 2005
#22
  • May 14, 2005
  • #22
final5-0 said:
If the air flow/fuel needs (tb, maf, fuel pump, inj's, etc) of a combo are exceeded then that is a mechanical prob that a custom tune just can't help.

Another thing I've seen some of the power adder guys talk about is fuel pressure doesn't always mean everything is ok. A blown combo also needs an ample volume of fuel at the correct pressure to safely feed it.

I don't know, but do you think that 190 in the tank is enough? Might wanna do some research about that.

Later
Grady
Click to expand...


Thats what Im thinking now, if its more then just some minor tweeking that needs to be done in the upper RPM's then the tune is not going to do it b/c it wont compensate for a lack of fuel or a retarted C&L that dosent work worth crap on a blown car.

I can go to the dyno and get the tune for $400 but what happens when I decide to upgrade parts for more power like heads, then Ive spent $400 on a tune and then have to go and get bigger injectors anyway.

I have to start planning my purchases based on future mods and not how it runs at the time. I should have gone w/ 42's to start but I grabed these #30's off ebay for $130

after doing some thinking and reading these replys I think the best corse of action is to go w/ a PRO-M and get some #42's. Your right the 190 may not be enough but I'll worry about that later on since it did not show a drop in fuel pressure at the higher RPM's.
 

mootang

New Member
Dec 5, 2004
907
0
0
texas
May 14, 2005
#23
  • May 14, 2005
  • #23
if it was me i would get bigger injecters and a tune.

good luck!
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
May 14, 2005
#24
  • May 14, 2005
  • #24
Striped5.0 said:
Thats what Im thinking now, if its more then just some minor tweeking that needs to be done in the upper RPM's then the tune is not going to do it b/c it wont compensate for a lack of fuel or a retarted C&L that dosent work worth crap on a blown car.
Click to expand...

Minor or Major tweeking won't help you

I can go to the dyno and get the tune for $400 but what happens when I decide to upgrade parts for more power like heads, then Ive spent $400 on a tune and then have to go and get bigger injectors anyway.
Click to expand...

You can't do that cause the 30's are too little

I have to start planning my purchases based on future mods and not how it runs at the time. I should have gone w/ 42's to start but I grabed these #30's off ebay for $130
Click to expand...

IMHO you are now thinking more wisely

after doing some thinking and reading these replys I think the best corse of action is to go w/ a PRO-M and get some #42's. Your right the 190 may not be enough but I'll worry about that later on since it did not show a drop in fuel pressure at the higher RPM's.
Click to expand...

Again I think the 190 MAY NOT be big enough to FEED the 42's when you put the hammer down. Pressure alone is not all that is needed.

Later
Grady
 

Trick95

Founding Member
Jan 20, 2000
2,298
0
47
Detroit, MI
May 14, 2005
#25
  • May 14, 2005
  • #25
If I was in your shoes, I would buy 42's, a calibrated MAF, a 255 in-tank pump and go get dyno tuned.

30's are waaay too small for a blown car at your power level. My 36's are just about maxed out for me.

I'm very surprised you are not running very lean as is.
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
May 14, 2005
#26
  • May 14, 2005
  • #26
Ok here is the deal.......

Im going to buy #42's and I have a dyno tune/chip burning session schduled for June 1st in Concord N.H at

http://www.performance-dyno.com/pages/1/index.htm

These guys are big time Stang guys and are a certified Superchips dealer/tuner.

Im keeping the C&L for the time being as much as I hate to but this is why. I can get a #42 sample tube for $35 VS $250 for a PRO-M Meter. The dyno tune and chip will cost $400 so Im going to do this on a budjet for now. They should be able to tune the car w/ a C&L on it w/ my combo they are good at what they do.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
May 14, 2005
#27
  • May 14, 2005
  • #27
Trick95 said:
If I was in your shoes, I would buy 42's, a calibrated MAF, a 255 in-tank pump and go get dyno tuned.

30's are waaay too small for a blown car at your power level. My 36's are just about maxed out for me.

I'm very surprised you are not running very lean as is.
Click to expand...

Here we Go

Now were gettin Somewhere

I place more importance on info based upon EXPERIENCE than info based upon an OPINION

Thanks for sharing

Later
Grady
 

Trick95

Founding Member
Jan 20, 2000
2,298
0
47
Detroit, MI
May 14, 2005
#28
  • May 14, 2005
  • #28
Striped5.0 said:
Ok here is the deal.......

Im going to buy #42's and I have a dyno tune/chip burning session schduled for June 1st in Concord N.H at

http://www.performance-dyno.com/pages/1/index.htm

These guys are big time Stang guys and are a certified Superchips dealer/tuner.

Im keeping the C&L for the time being as much as I hate to but this is why. I can get a #42 sample tube for $35 VS $250 for a PRO-M Meter. The dyno tune and chip will cost $400 so Im going to do this on a budjet for now. They should be able to tune the car w/ a C&L on it w/ my combo they are good at what they do.
Click to expand...

Good choice.

If your tuner is cool with the C&L then all is well.

Good luck! They'll probably be able to get a little more power out of it too!
 

Trick95

Founding Member
Jan 20, 2000
2,298
0
47
Detroit, MI
May 14, 2005
#29
  • May 14, 2005
  • #29
final5-0 said:
Here we Go

Now were gettin Somewhere

I place more importance on info based upon EXPERIENCE than info based upon an OPINION

Thanks for sharing

Later
Grady
Click to expand...

Anytime.
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
May 14, 2005
#30
  • May 14, 2005
  • #30
Trick95 said:
Good luck! They'll probably be able to get a little more power out of it too!
Click to expand...




Thats never a bad thing. If you go to there site and look under SCT HP Gains it shows graphs of before and after the chips. Usually a pretty good gain. Im not doing this for more power ( But I'll deff take it ) I just want it running right and running safe.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
May 14, 2005
#31
  • May 14, 2005
  • #31
Striped5.0 said:
Ok here is the deal.......

Im going to buy #42's and I have a dyno tune/chip burning session schduled for June 1st in Concord N.H at

http://www.performance-dyno.com/pages/1/index.htm

These guys are big time Stang guys and are a certified Superchips dealer/tuner.

Im keeping the C&L for the time being as much as I hate to but this is why. I can get a #42 sample tube for $35 VS $250 for a PRO-M Meter. The dyno tune and chip will cost $400 so Im going to do this on a budjet for now. They should be able to tune the car w/ a C&L on it w/ my combo they are good at what they do.
Click to expand...

Glad the sample tube will work out ok with the C&L

Since your gonna pay a Pro to tune, why not get his opinion about that 190 pump

If you do, let us know what he had to say

Later
Grady
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
May 15, 2005
#32
  • May 15, 2005
  • #32
Striped- my buddy Mike is selling a set of used 42's and a prom M 80. It was on his 10 second '92LX. He's steeping it up with a dart block based 347 and will need a larger injector, here's a link to his for sale post...

http://www.steelcitystangs.com/forums/showthread.php?t=924
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
May 15, 2005
#33
  • May 15, 2005
  • #33
Thanks Paul I just sent him an e-mail.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
May 15, 2005
#34
  • May 15, 2005
  • #34
 
B

BOSTANG

New Member
Apr 28, 2005
27
0
0
Mesa AZ
May 16, 2005
#35
  • May 16, 2005
  • #35
Sure am glad you went with 42's I tried to get by with 30's and a tune and the hole thing went bang #8 cylinder and piston all over the place. :damnit:
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
May 16, 2005
#36
  • May 16, 2005
  • #36
BOSTANG said:
Sure am glad you went with 42's I tried to get by with 30's and a tune and the hole thing went bang #8 cylinder and piston all over the place. :damnit:
Click to expand...

When I see peeps post stuff like this, I can't see it any other way but........

its just more positive proof that you don't wanna have too little fuel to feed your combo......makes no difference whether its Forced or NA.

Later
Grady
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
May 18, 2005
#37
  • May 18, 2005
  • #37
If you feel the 190 alone is not enough you also need to look at the size of the fuel line. The stock fuel line will not flow what the 255 pump can dish out. Our rails (94-95) can flow more than the stock 87-93 ones and should be ok (read prob. close when running over 10lbs of boost). Like others say the 190 is not going to cut it with boost and a good combo, maybe a inline pump can help a bit but again if issues arise after a pump of high volume is added the lines need to be looked at.

Just pointing that out as I didnt see that addressed and someone posted an issue with leaning out with a 255. I am not a charged or turbo user, so I am in no way saying I am all knowing, just from what I have seen others say about the fuel system on the 5.0's.
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
May 18, 2005
#38
  • May 18, 2005
  • #38
blksn955.o

I have been concerned about the 190 but for now its staying in. Ive spent so much money on the car this yr that after the dyno tune Im done for this yr. Also b/c I havent seen any need for a bigger pump yet. It was running lean in the upper RPM's but that was due to not big enough injectors. Someone kept and eye on the FP guage and at no time did the FP drop enough to indicate that the pump was not able to keep up. Unless otherwise discoverd the 190 is going to stay b/c the car is straing my bank accout this yr.
 
L

lietuvis91

New Member
Aug 4, 2004
102
0
0
NO, LA
May 19, 2005
#39
  • May 19, 2005
  • #39
wait, he's only making 350hp and already maxing out the 30s???? WOW, I thought 30lb injectors were good for over 400hp, but then again, you're boostin'...
 

rgs

New Member
Dec 11, 2004
124
0
0
Vancouver, Canada
May 19, 2005
#40
  • May 19, 2005
  • #40
im lucky if i got 240rwhp and i ran 13.7 and trapped at 102......
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
H
New kid on the block
  • HydraX
  • Mar 22, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
17
Views
709
The Welcome Wagon Mar 22, 2025
HydraX
H
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Resolved 2004 Mach 1 WOT fuel/spark issue?
  • gavinmgrant
  • Jan 12, 2023
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
5K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jul 8, 2023
gavinmgrant
G
Engine At the end of my sanity. 92 GT on jack stands for the last 11 years - NO START
  • Green 94 5.0
  • Apr 13, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 24, 2024
FastDriver
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?