• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

New Dyno #'s

  • Thread starter Thread starter Venom351R
  • Start date Start date Jun 10, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
40
98
MAINE
Jun 10, 2005
#1
  • Jun 10, 2005
  • #1
Went down to Concord N.H today and had an SCT chip burnt for my car. Wow what a diffrence it runs so much better and never even get above 200* anymore even w/ it being in the mid to high 80's today. The previous dyno I went to has some serious problems b/c there HP/TQ #'s are way off. The place I went to today was a dyno Jet. Here are the #'s

340 RWHP 353 RWTQ 82 degrees and 56% humidity. Not the best conditions for a dyno run but I know the car has the 350 RWHP in it that was my goal on stock heads and cam. I was seeing 10LBS of boost and one pull got 12PSI out of it. Over all Im very happy w/ the tune and how the car is running now. The power should be right where it should be for my mods. Not bad for a stock short block on stock heads/cam and 130,000 miles. The A/F Ratio are right on 11.5 right across for the most part.



 

WhiteStallionGT

Member
Aug 19, 2004
465
0
17
Northern VA / VT
Jun 10, 2005
#2
  • Jun 10, 2005
  • #2
Nice numbers man. That thing must pull like a bat out of hell.
 

95WhiteVenom

Founding Member
Oct 27, 2002
624
0
16
Alabama
Jun 10, 2005
#3
  • Jun 10, 2005
  • #3
nice that's some good numbers man!
 

Eric94GTvert

Founding Member
May 13, 2002
596
1
16
PA, Nazareth
Jun 10, 2005
#4
  • Jun 10, 2005
  • #4
Good #'s! Glad to see you got rid of the lean problem. Now get some track times!
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jun 10, 2005
#5
  • Jun 10, 2005
  • #5
We told you the 42's and ProM would play nice with the rest of your combo.

Glad things are goin good for you!!!

Later
Grady
 

RIO5.0

15 Year Member
Feb 16, 2001
6,892
8
128
N.H.
Jun 10, 2005
#6
  • Jun 10, 2005
  • #6
Sweet....I like those guys...They know there way around Fords too....How you like that SCT software??? Cool watching everything while its dynoing...
What kinda stuff did you remove or tweak with the chip???
We're supossed to bring the Cobra back shortly for a reburn....42s going in that and the FMU being tossed...
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Jun 10, 2005
#7
  • Jun 10, 2005
  • #7
Nice....
 

Stangfreak95

add a 4
Founding Member
Nov 4, 2002
3,571
0
0
In your sister. If none, your mom
Jun 10, 2005
#8
  • Jun 10, 2005
  • #8
Nice numbers
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
40
98
MAINE
Jun 10, 2005
#9
  • Jun 10, 2005
  • #9
RIO5.0 said:
Sweet....I like those guys...They know there way around Fords too....How you like that SCT software??? Cool watching everything while its dynoing...
What kinda stuff did you remove or tweak with the chip???
We're supossed to bring the Cobra back shortly for a reburn....42s going in that and the FMU being tossed...
Click to expand...



they riched it up down low and leaned it out some up top and adjusted when the fan kicks on..

The PRO-M and the #42's made all the diffrence. Its pretty cool how they burn the chips, hard to belive that little thing can make my car run so much better. Theres another Dyno Jet going in pretty soon in portland, I'll get some runs there when it is not as hott and humid, I really want a dyno sheet w/ 350 RWHP on this combo.
 

RIO5.0

15 Year Member
Feb 16, 2001
6,892
8
128
N.H.
Jun 10, 2005
#10
  • Jun 10, 2005
  • #10
I was wondering if you had them take out the shift retard or like kill the EGR, that sorta thing....I wanna especially have the shift retard die....
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
40
98
MAINE
Jun 10, 2005
#11
  • Jun 10, 2005
  • #11
RIO5.0 said:
I was wondering if you had them take out the shift retard or like kill the EGR, that sorta thing....I wanna especially have the shift retard die....
Click to expand...


No nothing like that was done, if /when I go back for a reflash I'll have that stuff done, I just wanted it running right this time around
 

Trick95

Founding Member
Jan 20, 2000
2,298
0
47
Detroit, MI
Jun 11, 2005
#12
  • Jun 11, 2005
  • #12
Congrats man! Glad to hear it's running safely!
 
N

Nobody

Founding Member
May 9, 2000
2,515
0
0
Kenmore, WA
Jun 11, 2005
#13
  • Jun 11, 2005
  • #13
Stock shortblock nothing! You're still on the stock LONG BLOCK! Congrats man I'm guessing you like the Paxton eh?
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
40
98
MAINE
Jun 12, 2005
#14
  • Jun 12, 2005
  • #14
Nobody said:
Stock shortblock nothing! You're still on the stock LONG BLOCK! Congrats man I'm guessing you like the Paxton eh?
Click to expand...


Yeah its a great blower, making good PSI for the stock pully and just a Power pipe put on. 10-12 PSI on the stock pully is not bad at all.
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Jun 12, 2005
#15
  • Jun 12, 2005
  • #15
I disagree with those numbers being nice.

Im not dissin' you Travis...but 340 seems low with your mods and NOT an AUTO, even if the conditions were bad.

I hit about 370 with a decent AFR with Stock heads/cam also, with an AODE. The car was "over richened" to bring the RWHP to about 350-ish. This was WITHOUT any tuning device...my TwEECer came in after.

IM glad though the car feels great.

RC
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
40
98
MAINE
Jun 13, 2005
#16
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #16
94GTLaserRC said:
I disagree with those numbers being nice.

Im not dissin' you Travis...but 340 seems low with your mods and NOT an AUTO, even if the conditions were bad.

I hit about 370 with a decent AFR with Stock heads/cam also, with an AODE. The car was "over richened" to bring the RWHP to about 350-ish. This was WITHOUT any tuning device...my TwEECer came in after.

IM glad though the car feels great.

RC
Click to expand...

Im sure I would have hit the upper 350's if it was not so hott/humid So Im right in the general ball park of where I should be. More important then anything the car is running the way it should and its tunned safe. With proper traction/suspension set up its good for some mid to low 12 sec runs.

OH YEAH BTW: I COUGHT YOU


PS: What was your fuel pressure set at? Mine is set at the stock 40 PSI and tunned from there.
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Jun 13, 2005
#17
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #17
Striped5.0 said:
Im sure I would have hit the upper 350's if it was not so hott/humid So Im right in the general ball park of where I should be. More important then anything the car is running the way it should and its tunned safe. With proper traction/suspension set up its good for some mid to low 12 sec runs.

OH YEAH BTW: I COUGHT YOU


PS: What was your fuel pressure set at? Mine is set at the stock 40 PSI and tunned from there.
Click to expand...

I have a STOCK FPR... Yeah, I like to see low track times vs Dyno numbers, but I was just surprised that it wasnt higher.

You caught me b/c you whined to the mod about your post count after the stangnet crash
RC
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
40
98
MAINE
Jun 13, 2005
#18
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #18
94GTLaserRC said:
You caught me b/c you whined to the mod about your post count after the stangnet crash
RC
Click to expand...


I only got back what I lost. Anyone could have asked to get there count back if they wanted. I only asked once.
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
Jun 13, 2005
#19
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #19
Striped5.0 said:
Im sure I would have hit the upper 350's if it was not so hott/humid So Im right in the general ball park of where I should be. More important then anything the car is running the way it should and its tunned safe. With proper traction/suspension set up its good for some mid to low 12 sec runs.

OH YEAH BTW: I COUGHT YOU


PS: What was your fuel pressure set at? Mine is set at the stock 40 PSI and tunned from there.
Click to expand...

um i hope you can run 11s with that
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
40
98
MAINE
Jun 13, 2005
#20
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #20
95snoozer said:
um i hope you can run 11s with that
Click to expand...


on the stock suspension w/ 130,000 miles in it prob not. After I upgrade to new suspension parts next yr.. I hope so.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
717
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
S
5.0 Rebuild
  • smittys7up
  • Nov 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
524
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 20, 2025
Noobz347
P
New to StangNET
  • Popeye1790
  • Apr 19, 2024
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
899
The Welcome Wagon Apr 19, 2024
Popeye1790
P
Engine Roller Rocker to Valve Retainer Interference - Possible Source of Valve Train Noise
  • AeroCoupe
  • May 22, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2023
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?