SN95 Mass air sensor in a fox?

Well i snagged a mass air sensor off a 94gt from ebay. I was orginally going to have the flange cut off but there is a slight lip or angled part right behind the flange. Im not sure if the CAI and clamp would still seal properly. Pics so you can see exactly what i mean:
PA170036.webp

PA170035.webp


And stock vs 94 just to show the opening difference for anyone considering doing this. (stock is on right)

PA170038.webp
 

Attachments

  • PA170036.webp
    PA170036.webp
    14.9 KB · Views: 127
  • PA170035.webp
    PA170035.webp
    13.4 KB · Views: 121
  • PA170038.webp
    PA170038.webp
    23.3 KB · Views: 134
Not trying to highjack the thread or anything, but if I spliced in or made an adapter plug, could I use an 03/04 mach 1 mass air meter? I know they also contain the IAC and my stock one under the intake is bad so I could just wire all of that up to work, rather than pull my upper intake off to change the IAC sensor.
 
795.0pacecar said:
Not trying to highjack the thread or anything, but if I spliced in or made an adapter plug, could I use an 03/04 mach 1 mass air meter? I know they also contain the IAC and my stock one under the intake is bad so I could just wire all of that up to work, rather than pull my upper intake off to change the IAC sensor.
As you noted, I can see the MAF/MAS portion working (with tuning for fuel considerations) but I doubt the IAC function would be correct even with a tune.

Good luck.
 
Before I switched over to a SD setup via megasquirt…I ran a pro-m univer maf sensor calibrated for a 96 4.6 mustang on my 5.0L. It worked flawlessly…I just modified my existing pigtail to fit inside of the 96 maf sensor.
 
HISSIN50 said:
As you noted, I can see the MAF/MAS portion working (with tuning for fuel considerations) but I doubt the IAC function would be correct even with a tune.

Good luck.


I could probable just check the resistence of the built in IAC sensor and compare it to a EECIV one. If it doesn't work its no big deal, I'll just have to pull the intake and replace it.
 
stangjunkie said:
i've wonderd could one port the stock meter if all you want is more flow?? pull out the electronics and port the flow area??

No.

when the airflow changes the output of the MAS must change as well.

By hogging out the MAF you would be flowing more air than the voltage output of the MAS would be indicating.


For low buck MAF alternatives the sn95 MAF is the best alternative.



jason
 
jrichker said:
After doing a search on two of the auto parts online catalogs, it appears that the 3.8 V6 and the 5.0 V8 use the same mass air sensor & housing. I learn new stuff every day... I stand corrected, sorry about the error.

Im running a 3.8L maf on my stang right now for my 19lbers :nice: ...also a 3.8L Taurus/Sable SD computer will work for a SD 5.0 stang...When I did my maf conversion thats what was in it...noticed it was slightly shorter than the 5.0L computer also
 
How does a V6 computer work with regard to injector firing on a V8? I've seen a few folks over the years post about using the above-mentioned computer, but I never understood that aspect (it was the most glaring at first blush).....
 
GT89Mustang said:
Yea thanks, considering its my thread i have.

Well, there's a link there that discusses the adapters and where to get them in some detail. To just say that there are adapters available doesn't help you one bit because it's unlikely you would find the correct adapter. You can either make an adapter like I did, cut the flange off of your meter or you can buy an adapter from the sole remaining source on the Internet.

Anyway, here is the link to an adapter...

http://www.kustomz.com/cat3.html

Buy the TR70 for $44.95.