• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

SN95 Steering And Suspension

  • Thread starter Thread starter RaggedGT
  • Start date Start date Feb 28, 2018
  • Tags Tags
    5.0 beer gt junk noobz is evil steering stopping suspension
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

RaggedGT

Been here over a DECADE and still no CT
Mod Dude
Jul 20, 2014
4,737
3,184
203
Taylorsville ky
Feb 28, 2018
#1
  • Feb 28, 2018
  • #1
Another random thought/realization thread from me
‘95 GT-currently awaiting a transmission rebuild (long story-but in process.)
Motor is coming out in a couple of weekends for a refresh. I got to thinking about all the squeaks and creaks the car made when it actually drove/and the power steering fluid leak from the rack. So after filling my cart with MM Tubular control arms and looking up K members and coil overs etc. It hit me. If I’m lucky,after the engine refresh and the rebuilt aode-I’ll be lucky to be pushing 275rwhp. Do I really need the light weight,corner carving adjustable suspension?
My ultimate goal is to put it back together as a driver,and just drive it.
I paroozed around Rock Auto and looked up OE replacement parts,and the cost as you would imagine is a lot less lol.


Stock shocks suffice?


Or would the KYB’s be a noticeable upgrade?

Same with the struts?

Factory rotor prices and these drilled and slotted rotors are pretty comparable. Are they any better than the stockers?


My hub bearings seem fine-but while it’s all blown apart?


Just to add to the confusion-my car sits high,like four wheel drive status. I’d like to lower it slightly. Like less than an inch in the rear. And a little less in the front. You guys have any experience/Recommendations for coil springs?
That’s pretty much it- Good,Bad or indifferent, let me have it
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Feb 28, 2018
#2
  • Feb 28, 2018
  • #2
Here's the thing, the k member is obviously easier with the engine out, but still possible with it in.
So you don't "have" to have it now.
It's a little bit of a pointless modification in most situations.
Would I do one again? Yeah, but after I had every other thing I ever wanted.

I like the coil overs for adjustable ride height, ease of swapping springs and working on the car.
I also like adjustable shocks, but I don't think the average guy needs more than basic single adjustable with a couple settings.

For you? I think the k member can wait.
 
Reactions: RaggedGT

RaggedGT

Been here over a DECADE and still no CT
Mod Dude
Jul 20, 2014
4,737
3,184
203
Taylorsville ky
Feb 28, 2018
#3
  • Feb 28, 2018
  • #3
2000xp8 said:
Here's the thing, the k member is obviously easier with the engine out, but still possible with it in.
So you don't "have" to have it now.
It's a little bit of a pointless modification in most situations.
Would I do one again? Yeah, but after I had every other thing I ever wanted.

I like the coil overs for adjustable ride height, ease of swapping springs and working on the car.
I also like adjustable shocks, but I don't think the average guy needs more than basic single adjustable with a couple settings.

For you? I think the k member can wait.
Click to expand...
That’s exactly the reason I keep going back and forth between after market or stock... Weight savings and corner carving. Not so much an issue- Access and Adjustability/ Coil overs.. That’s what’s making me indecisive lol
 

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Feb 28, 2018
#4
  • Feb 28, 2018
  • #4
An aftermarket k member makes it alot easier to work on our cars. The stock k member isn't that heavy at all, though. The inner thing i don't like about aftermarket k members is that it's difficult to brace to the body of the car. The factory k member has a V shaped factory brace that goes from the core support to the k member and from the k member to the frame area of the body.

I know my convertible had it stock. There was a little flex until i installed a strut tower brace. The stock k member didn't really move at all once i installed full length subframe connectors.

The biggest benefit from changing the k member is if you ever have to do the rack.

I swear doing a rack in a mustang with a factory k member can be a PITA
 
Last edited: Feb 28, 2018
Reactions: RaggedGT

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,217
17,900
224
Massachusetts
Feb 28, 2018
#5
  • Feb 28, 2018
  • #5
If you are changing out the steering rack, go for the cardone 22-2000 instead. 03-04 Cobra specs, and the same price
 
Reactions: mikestang63 and RaggedGT

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Feb 28, 2018
#6
  • Feb 28, 2018
  • #6
The problem is that a k member with arms and coil overs is like paying $1500 for better access.
The access can be valuable (although I got by for 20 years without it), but is it really worth that much money right now?

What I would probably consider is an MM steering shaft while you are messing with all of it.
 
Reactions: RaggedGT

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Mar 1, 2018
#7
  • Mar 1, 2018
  • #7
Mustang5L5 said:
If you are changing out the steering rack, go for the cardone 22-2000 instead. 03-04 Cobra specs, and the same price
Click to expand...
i know of someone who has a true ford 03 cobra rack for sale right now. and i think its pretty much new.
 

Boostedpimp

20+ Year Stangneter
May 8, 2003
1,451
493
154
NJ
Mar 1, 2018
#8
  • Mar 1, 2018
  • #8
Tubular k, a arms, and coilovers are valuable mods if your seeking weight savings, ease of access and ability to tune your front suspension and ride height. I've swapped them in on the last four foxbodies I've owned and never regretted the move yet.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Mar 1, 2018
#9
  • Mar 1, 2018
  • #9
The weight loss is really negligible using any quality k member sturdy enough for corner carving duty.
A decent portion of the weight savings could just be had by going to coil overs.

http://www.maximummotorsports.com/Weight-Myths-about-K-members.aspx

That's about $1500 to lose roughly 40lbs.
You could buy a set of twisted wedges, gain 25+rwhp and lose 50lbs for less money.

Simple math suggests that a k member should not be a priority.
 
Reactions: revhead347

RaggedGT

Been here over a DECADE and still no CT
Mod Dude
Jul 20, 2014
4,737
3,184
203
Taylorsville ky
Mar 1, 2018
#10
  • Mar 1, 2018
  • #10
2000xp8 said:
The weight loss is really negligible using any quality k member sturdy enough for corner carving duty.
A decent portion of the weight savings could just be had by going to coil overs.

http://www.maximummotorsports.com/Weight-Myths-about-K-members.aspx

That's about $1500 to lose roughly 40lbs.
You could buy a set of twisted wedges, gain 25+rwhp and lose 50lbs for less money.

Simple math suggests that a k member should not be a priority.
Click to expand...
I agree with you. K member and coil overs would be nice to have-but not in the immediate plans. I’m going to go the Oe/Moog route for steering/suspension. I am going to look into the Cobra steering rack and the MM steering shaft though
As much as I’d like to upgrade to a set of aluminum heads and a better intake. The GT40 top end is what’s going back in the car.
Thanks everybody for your input this far
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Mar 1, 2018
#11
  • Mar 1, 2018
  • #11
90% of street cars have no real advantage in swapping K members. Unless you run long tubes, a turbo,or swap motors most guys will never notice it.
 

Boostedpimp

20+ Year Stangneter
May 8, 2003
1,451
493
154
NJ
Mar 1, 2018
#12
  • Mar 1, 2018
  • #12
Or
mikestang63 said:
90% of street cars have no real advantage in swapping K members. Unless you run long tubes, a turbo,or swap motors most guys will never notice it.
Click to expand...
if you need to get to your starter or pull your oil pan down
 
Reactions: 90sickfox

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,777
6,933
214
SW Houston
Mar 1, 2018
#13
  • Mar 1, 2018
  • #13
Power steering - Booooooooo!

You’re a big guy, manual racks aren’t bad.
 
Reactions: RaggedGT

RaggedGT

Been here over a DECADE and still no CT
Mod Dude
Jul 20, 2014
4,737
3,184
203
Taylorsville ky
Mar 1, 2018
#14
  • Mar 1, 2018
  • #14
hoopty5.0 said:
Power steering - Booooooooo!

You’re a big guy, manual racks aren’t bad.
Click to expand...
Then you’re really not gonna like it has fully functional AC
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,296
1,638
214
Acworth, GA
Mar 1, 2018
#15
  • Mar 1, 2018
  • #15
mikestang63 said:
90% of street cars have no real advantage in swapping K members. Unless you run long tubes, a turbo,or swap motors most guys will never notice it.
Click to expand...

Longtubes with a factory K-member really isn't that big of a deal.

To the OP, just fix what's broke. The front bearings are double ball bearing, and start to ride with only a little bit of age. You can check them with a dial indicator. As for the ball joints, tie rod ends, etc, if they are wore out, replace them. As for the tubular stuff, I could take it or leave it. As said before, it's a lot of money spent for minimal gain. If you really want carve some corners, spend your money on quality shocks, rear control arms, and tires.

Kurt
 
Reactions: General karthief

Steel1

Mustang Master
Aug 18, 2017
1,419
639
143
Connecticut
Mar 2, 2018
#16
  • Mar 2, 2018
  • #16
I just completed suspension work on my 93GT.
I wanted coil overs for adjustability but since it's purely a street car didn't think
doing the K member was worth the money/time. I wanted to address the
front control arm bushings, ball joints and shock/struts as well.
So in the end I went with tubular front control arms, coil overs and new
shocks/struts while leaving the stock K. Once the weather breaks I'll see
how it rides.
 
Reactions: RaggedGT

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,777
6,933
214
SW Houston
Mar 2, 2018
#17
  • Mar 2, 2018
  • #17
RaggedGT said:
Then you’re really not gonna like it has fully functional AC
Click to expand...
Oh no, I've always had and always will have A/C. But Finding a decent replacement P/S pump at a reasonable price is impossible, as is having one that doesn't leak.
 
Reactions: RaggedGT

88LXSleeper

Active Member
Jan 6, 2016
146
56
48
Mar 2, 2018
#18
  • Mar 2, 2018
  • #18
I just replaced all the tired bushings everywhere, budget lowering springs and shock package from LMR, SFC, strut tower brace, C and C plates, and panhard bar. Stock ball joints and tie rod ends, went with lower ratio rack.
Budget build for track car and daily driver, was much better for track and worth it on street for what I spent.
Not a fan of slotted/drilled rotors, don't need them unless you like that look I guess.
 
Reactions: RaggedGT

RaggedGT

Been here over a DECADE and still no CT
Mod Dude
Jul 20, 2014
4,737
3,184
203
Taylorsville ky
Mar 6, 2018
#19
  • Mar 6, 2018
  • #19
Are slotted/drilled rotors much of an upgrade over stock rotors?
I like them as a Visual Upgrade ,but an actual upgrade would be nice as well lol
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2016
27,872
10,542
203
polk county florida
Mar 6, 2018
#20
  • Mar 6, 2018
  • #20
Two things, well three really.
Why spend $230 apiece for control arms when you could do the bushings and ball joints on both sides for less than half the price of one new control arm, if you want shiny then blast them and por15, they will look like new. I think the tubular control arms are not much more money
Replacing the starter with long tubes are not an issue if you use the 92-3 style starter, I just changed mine in my 89 gt in about 20 minutes
 
Reactions: 88LXSleeper
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
66 Suspension and Steering Rebuild
  • cturboaddict
  • Oct 6, 2019
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
4K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 30, 2021
cturboaddict
C
Progress Thread 87' GT rescue
  • africansnowowl
  • Apr 29, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 2, 2020
Cheapskate207
JCBeaver's 1993 GT Coyote Swap "The Never-Ending Project"
  • JCBeaver
  • Aug 13, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 8 9 10
Replies
182
Views
33K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 2, 2020
JCBeaver
N
A 'bit' Of A Mustang-a-holic
  • Nick94657
  • Jan 26, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 18, 2017
ernnessstoo
E
  • Locked
SOLD 1995 Mustang Gt In Los Angeles, Ca, $2800
  • Chythar
  • Nov 29, 2016
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
6K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Nov 29, 2016
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?