• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Which heads TFS/AFR

  • Thread starter Thread starter TallyMan
  • Start date Start date Jul 6, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
T

TallyMan

Founding Member
May 29, 2002
293
0
0
Litchfield, NH
Jul 6, 2004
#1
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #1
Guys-

I'm looking for reccomendations on heads. I am currently running gt-40x heads, but am thinking of upgrading during my P1SC install. Two things, one which do people like better the TFS or AFR. And if you have a preference which model to get, such as 165's or 185's also any info on additional parts needed or suggested upgrades would be appreciated. I tried a search and got very mixed results.. I am more looking for suggestions for my combo, which is:
GT-40 long block, E303, gt-40x alum heads,gt-40 intake, cobra ECU, full exhaust,etc.... HP figures below. The supercharger is in the mail and I intend on running 42lb's, univer mass, and about 10-12lb's of boost.. Any ideas would be appreciated.

Steve
 

82boy

New Member
Jun 22, 2004
41
0
0
Jul 6, 2004
#2
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #2
i am sure i will get flamed for this i like tfs heads much better. depends on your combo I have seen amazing things out of a set of twisted wedge heads. i run high ports and love them. i also think the tw r head is the greatest thing since sliced bread. if i did not have so many pasrts left over from my canfields I would have ran the r head instead of the high ports.

i have seen people with similare combos as yours running good with box stock twisted wedge heads
 
T

TallyMan

Founding Member
May 29, 2002
293
0
0
Litchfield, NH
Jul 6, 2004
#3
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #3
thanks 82boy-

I am thinking I could probably pickup about 10-20rwhp just adding the TFS heads over my gt-40x heads.... Never mind the charger... Anyway, how do the TFS heads perform with a blower, and would I need other things done to accept them like notching the pistons, pushrods, etc?? With my E303 cam and 1.7 rollers I think I run a total of about .512 lift or something..

Steve
 

HyPer-50

Member
Jun 26, 2003
377
0
16
Woodstock, GA
Jul 7, 2004
#4
  • Jul 7, 2004
  • #4
I would definatly go with some AFR 185's or maybe even 205's.
 

dcrahn

Founding Member
May 24, 2002
224
0
0
Springfield, GA
Jul 7, 2004
#5
  • Jul 7, 2004
  • #5
Jon Kaase small block heads.
http://www.jegs.com/cgi-bin/ncommerce3/ProductDisplay?prrfnbr=156886&prmenbr=361
 

82boy

New Member
Jun 22, 2004
41
0
0
Jul 7, 2004
#6
  • Jul 7, 2004
  • #6
tw heads work great with a blower or turbo. i dont know if it will clear with your e cam something you will have to reasearch. but with 1.7's i think you would have to change pistons. but i think any head you run you might have ptv clearence with any head with the 1.7 rockers and e cam.

i have seen amazing things out of them heads. as far as natural i saw stock block 302 with a afm n64 cam vic jr int. 750 holley box stock tfs tw heads run in the mid 11's with factory suspention till he broke the rear end on slick launch.

a budy of mine had a set of box stock tw heads on a 306 with a set of t bird turbos running in the high 10's not sure what cam he had but i thought is was a alphabet ford cam.

them heads have been around a log time and work great.
 
H

Highbredcloud

Active Member
Mar 4, 2003
1,075
1
36
Palos Hills, IL
Jul 7, 2004
#7
  • Jul 7, 2004
  • #7
I would stick with your GT-40X heads...I don't think it is worth swapping heads just to get 10-20RWHP...The GT-40 head design is actually pretty good...if you really want them to work well with a blower...port the exhaust side and do some bowl blending...and you got yourself an awsome head...or just add more boost...keep in mind...when you swap heads you will have to port match the GT-40 lower to the TW heads and even the AFR's simply because the GT-40 lower is way small especially right by the injector area...I would strongly recommend you opening that part up...other than that you seem to have a nice combo going for you...possibly a custom cam would definately awaken your car...
 

82boy

New Member
Jun 22, 2004
41
0
0
Jul 7, 2004
#8
  • Jul 7, 2004
  • #8
Highbredcloud said:
I would stick with your GT-40X heads...I don't think it is worth swapping heads just to get 10-20RWHP...The GT-40 head design is actually pretty good...if you really want them to work well with a blower...port the exhaust side and do some bowl blending...and you got yourself an awsome head...or just add more boost...keep in mind...when you swap heads you will have to port match the GT-40 lower to the TW heads and even the AFR's simply because the GT-40 lower is way small especially right by the injector area...I would strongly recommend you opening that part up...other than that you seem to have a nice combo going for you...possibly a custom cam would definately awaken your car...
Click to expand...

i would have to agree 100% you have a good combo i dont know that you would pick up that much hp from switching heads.

as far as the question goes i like tfs over afr personal preference if you dead set on changing out heads i would go with the tw heads they have great potential if you what to do more down the road.
 

drgn5.0

Founding Member
Mar 13, 2001
603
0
0
Jul 7, 2004
#9
  • Jul 7, 2004
  • #9
afr has a option on their heads for bigger exhaust ports for induction apps. you have to specify that you want them when ordering tho.
 
S

Stalone93GT

Founding Member
Jun 9, 2002
232
0
0
Pomona, California
Jul 8, 2004
#10
  • Jul 8, 2004
  • #10
If you have been reading any of the muscle mustang and fast fords, they just got done doing a huge cyclinder head blow out and the AFR kicked ass. I am planing on getting a set for my 408 next year..

I think you will gain more horse power by switching the heads when you slap the charger on.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jul 8, 2004
#11
  • Jul 8, 2004
  • #11
Stalone93GT said:
I think you will gain more horse power by switching the heads when you slap the charger on.
Click to expand...

Definitely
 
M

mackey

Active Member
Jan 25, 2003
1,284
1
38
Beverly, Massachusetts
Jul 8, 2004
#12
  • Jul 8, 2004
  • #12
The reason I picked TW over AFR was because with the TW heads you can have 2.02 valves and not have to notch your pistons.
 

82boy

New Member
Jun 22, 2004
41
0
0
Jul 8, 2004
#13
  • Jul 8, 2004
  • #13
mackey said:
The reason I picked TW over AFR was because with the TW heads you can have 2.02 valves and not have to notch your pistons.
Click to expand...
this also depends on your cam. they use a diferent piston as far as valve notches when larger cams are used

as far as mm&ff i dont belive everything i read.
 

maverick0716

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2002
3,924
0
56
Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Jul 8, 2004
#14
  • Jul 8, 2004
  • #14
HyPer-50 said:
I would definatly go with some AFR 185's or maybe even 205's.
Click to expand...

The 205's would be way too big. You need some seriously high top end hp to even come close to needing those (like 6500+ rpm). But I do think he should go with the 185's for sure, especially for the blower.
 

5.0 HOtrain

Founding Member
May 20, 2001
2,247
0
47
New Hampshire
Jul 8, 2004
#15
  • Jul 8, 2004
  • #15
FWIW

A friend of mine (swinerton on the corral) has stock bottom end, TFS heads, stage 1 cam, and track heat intake. With around 11-13 psi with an "S" trim it made 508rwhp. Not a good idea for stock parts, but awesome power none the less.
mike.
 
S

SmockDoiley

New Member
Jun 14, 2003
1,591
2
0
San Diego, CA
Jul 8, 2004
#16
  • Jul 8, 2004
  • #16
here ya go, this will settle everything because this topic is always beatin into the ground.
 

Attachments

  • the answer.webp
    25 KB · Views: 241

QDRHRSE

New Member
Dec 31, 2002
1,590
0
0
Palmdale, CA
Jul 8, 2004
#17
  • Jul 8, 2004
  • #17
SmockDoiley said:
here ya go, this will settle everything because this topic is always beatin into the ground.
Click to expand...

Right on brother
 
T

TallyMan

Founding Member
May 29, 2002
293
0
0
Litchfield, NH
Jul 10, 2004
#18
  • Jul 10, 2004
  • #18
What about the Jon Kaase heads listed at the top..

I always did lean towards the AFR's... Although I've been reading about those new heads from jeg's, that someone listed at the very top of this thread from Jon Kaase, they sound pretty good... Anyone have any input on those???

SmockDoiley- If you have nothing nice to say, shut it... Mind your business, and grow up.

Thanks to everyone else that is mature enough to not say anything if they dont have positive input. I've always looked on this site and enjoyed it till this bozo popped up.

Steve
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Jul 10, 2004
#19
  • Jul 10, 2004
  • #19
AFR vs. TFS??? It's pretty much a toss up because I have scene both make really good power. You can't loose either way. I think AFR has the upper hand though. One thing I like about TFS is that they move the valves closer to the middle of the combustion chamber so you can run a larger valve with stock pistons and when the valve is further from the cylinder wall it reduces shrowding of the valve, which isn't picked up on the flowbench.

For 302-310 cid N/A apps, I think the clear answer is AFR 165's, but it's more of a toss up with blown or stroker combo's.
 
T

TallyMan

Founding Member
May 29, 2002
293
0
0
Litchfield, NH
Jul 10, 2004
#20
  • Jul 10, 2004
  • #20
Hey 90mustangGt-

Thanks good info... Did you follow that link at the top of the thread to jegs/jon Kaase heads.... Seems pretty neat, whats your thought on it??

Steve
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
Forced Induction On3 turbo on stock 89 with 87K miles --suggestions
  • tank76
  • Aug 2, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
35
Views
8K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 27, 2024
AeroCoupe
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
A
Fox Planning on building my foxbody and was wondering if I can get any tips or anything to watch out for!
  • Angelq1028
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
76
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 29, 2025
Robman8028
R
Engine GT40P questions and advice
  • sav22rem22
  • Mar 11, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 31, 2023
sav22rem22
P
Thoughts on this odd (smog legal) combo?
  • PJV9126
  • Feb 8, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 16, 2023
91AOD5.0LX
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?