• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

5.0 Rebuild

  • Thread starter Thread starter smittys7up
  • Start date Start date Nov 29, 2025
  • Tags Tags
    5.0 foxbody gt40p rebuild
S

smittys7up

Member
Nov 29, 2025
3
3
13
Michigan
Nov 29, 2025
#1
  • Nov 29, 2025
  • #1
Hello,

First time poster and excited to be here.

Picked up my first Mustang - 1990 5.0 with a 5 speed a few months ago. It appears to be a 7up edition but have not verified this. So I've only drove it about 45 minutes home after the initial purchase and then around the block a couple times. After parking it I found a decent amount of oil leaking onto the ground, and most of the engine, trans, underbody seems to be saturated. With winter now set in here in Michigan I figured this is the time to tear into it.

So upon pulling the motor I've found the valve cover bolts to be finger tight lol. Assuming this was the source it since oil was caked all over the engine bay. I've picked up some Explorer parts including upper/lower intake and GT40P heads. I mocked up a set of BBK shorty equal length headers and they may work with 90 degree boots. I also have a B303 cam, 24lb injectors w/ calibrated MAF on the shelf. I have read the A9L ECU can handle these sort of changes, I hope this is true. Just going for a close to stock or mild build.

So today I disassembled the GT40P heads. Need to extract the broken intake bolt I found. But other than that, the disassembly went well. I tried cutting a deep well socket and using my drill press to remove the valve springs. Definitely paid off. I do have the hand crank spring compressor tool and after doing 1 spring by hand I'll go witht eh socket/drill press method from here on out!

I'll attach some photos of the car/engine/heads. I did a dry and wet compression test and then a leak down at 100psi. I'll attach those notes as well. Figure the results weren't horrible and the car was running fine, but any opinions on the results or anything else is this build are welcomed! Would hate to miss some simple stuff while I'm this far in.

TIA
Jake
 
Reactions: gkomo

Mcmahst

5 Year Member
Jan 19, 2021
706
284
83
Laguna Woods CA, fort Mohave AZ
Nov 30, 2025
#2
  • Nov 30, 2025
  • #2
Welcome. Nice find. Should be a fun project. Good luck.
 
Reactions: smittys7up

gkomo

now i can hopefully expect to receive the shaft
Aug 2, 2024
2,318
1,534
133
San Diego, CA
Nov 30, 2025
#3
  • Nov 30, 2025
  • #3
Keep us posted with progress and pictures!

And yes I believe the stock computer can handle all that you have planned.

Hell I ran a H/C/I 331 with 24lb injectors and calibrated MAF, no ‘tune’ or chip, just the stock A9L and it ripped.
 
Reactions: smittys7up and General karthief

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,303
1,648
214
Acworth, GA
Dec 4, 2025
#4
  • Dec 4, 2025
  • #4
Looks like a really clean car. Are you going to change all the gaskets on the engine while it's out. I'd do a rear main seal, a nice one piece oil pan gasket, front seal, etc.

Kurt
 
Reactions: smittys7up

AeroCoupe

lube between the nut and the face. I know my lubes
Founding Member
Oct 28, 2001
6,184
4,282
183
Claremore, OK
Dec 4, 2025
#5
  • Dec 4, 2025
  • #5
Timing chain, new oil pump with pickup and hardened ARP oil pump drive shaft. What are your plans on the GT40 heads? At a minimum you will need some decent springs for the cam. If you have not already thought of this then these are probably the most common setup for a stock iron head:

https://www.trickflow.com/parts/tfs-2500100#overview
 
Last edited: Dec 5, 2025
Reactions: smittys7up, JD1964, slow84lx and 1 other person
P

Praetorious

Active Member
May 22, 2020
102
55
38
living room.
Dec 20, 2025
#6
  • Dec 20, 2025
  • #6
Man what a nice car,the interior is in great shape,body is straight and the paint looks good too, for what i assume (by your location) is a northern car it must have been garaged most of its life cause it still has its body,lol, what a fantastic winter project.

I used to have one of those hoods on my 91 but mine didn't have the grilled inserts, not sure why i got rid of it but its been a couple of decades,
i wish you lots of fun with the car and the guys here are top notch when it comes to knowledge, they got you covered.
 
Reactions: smittys7up

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,522
21,694
234
Box behind Walmart
Dec 20, 2025
#7
  • Dec 20, 2025
  • #7
This is just for reference and includes my current list of off-the-shelf cams for GT40P upgrades.

I included the B-303 in the last line just as a reference to the others.

Oh, and I assumed a 3:55 rear end gear (N/A setups respond very well to this).

302 / GT40P Street Cam Reference Table​

CamshaftDuration @ .050"Valve Lift (Int/Exh)Recommended Springs (GT40P-friendly)
Trick Flow Stage 1 (TFS-51402000)221° / 225°.499" / .510"Comp GT40/P spring kit or Alex’s Parts Max Output II
Comp XE264HR (35-349-8)212° / 218°.512" / .512"Alex’s Parts Max Output II kit
Lunati Voodoo 20350711221° / 229°.549" / .565"Lunati LT73100K2 or LT74820K1 spring kits
AFM N-41~222° / ~232°~.512" / ~.512"Alex’s Parts Max Output II (for lift margin)
Ford E-303 (M-6250-E303)220° / 220°.498" / .498"Comp GT40/P spring kit or Alex’s Parts Max Output II
Ford B-303 (M-6250-B303)224° / 224°.480" / .480"Comp GT40/P spring kit (easy clearance)

Notes (Important for a GT40P + 3.55 build)​


1 “Best match” for your combo?
With 3.55 gears, long-tubes, and GT40P heads:
Trick Flow Stage 1 or Comp XE264HR will feel perfect on the street — fat torque, EFI friendly, no drama.


2 Lift limits on P-heads:
Above ~.510" lift, check retainer/guide clearance.
The Lunati cam is a monster, but you’re into “measure everything” territory.


3 B-303 vs modern grinds:
The B-303 is useful as a comparison point — but the newer profiles absolutely walk it in torque and drivability.


4 Idle personality ranking (mild → rowdy):
XE264HR → E-303 → TFS1 → B-303 → N-41 → Lunati
- The last two generally require a tune.
- None of these setups require 24 lb injectors so, save yourself some money. Even if you have them, it will run better on 19s without a tune.
- If you add boost later, you'll likely need some #42+ injectors.
 
Reactions: smittys7up and SeaCorey

nickyb

I gotta say i never painted my nuts, Never Ever
15 Year Member
Apr 3, 2009
3,039
1,666
163
nevada
Dec 20, 2025
#8
  • Dec 20, 2025
  • #8
I'd be a little Leary of those compression numbers, seems like 20% .
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,522
21,694
234
Box behind Walmart
Dec 20, 2025
#9
  • Dec 20, 2025
  • #9
nickyb said:
I'd be a little Leary of those compression numbers, seems like 20% .
Click to expand...


Send It!
 
Reactions: smittys7up
S

smittys7up

Member
Nov 29, 2025
3
3
13
Michigan
Sep 13, 2026
#10
  • Sep 13, 2026
  • #10
I'm sure it was fine to "send it" as Noobz347 suggested lol.
The block just went out to get honed, crank polished if needed, mic'd for bearings, degreased etc.. It all looked clean and probably recent rebuilt. Only thing that stood out was the amount of carbon and build up on the pistons.
I found a double roller timing chain and cam stamped '0319'. Also #6 rod was missing and replaced with another #7 rod and cap.
Noobz347 - I'm agreeing with your cam choices, thank you for the detailed info. Think I'll sell the B cam and pickup a TF Stage 1.
Is there a recommended rebuild kit for 1990 roller blocks, or recommended rear main seal and bearings?
Keep the great info coming guys!
 

Attachments

  • 113437.webp
    17 KB · Views: 30
  • IMG_0680.webp
    356.7 KB · Views: 33
  • IMG_0686.webp
    89.8 KB · Views: 30
Reactions: DadLife0724 and gkomo

Qtrhrse23

Active Member
Jul 2, 2024
78
29
28
Texas
Sep 14, 2026
#11
  • Sep 14, 2026
  • #11
How many miles? Those pistons ARE CLEAN IMO for a 36 year old. YES 36 years.

Whats wrong with the stock cam? Everybody WANTS the chop chop, but cam wont give you alot more power, AND the stock cam drives so smooth. But since you are rebuilding, I guess my arguement is MOOT.
 
Reactions: Potomus Pete

Qtrhrse23

Active Member
Jul 2, 2024
78
29
28
Texas
Sep 14, 2026
#12
  • Sep 14, 2026
  • #12
Good move on the cam change. I HATE THOSE (4 LETTER WORD) LETTER CAMS.

So its been rebuilt before, thats why those pistons look like they did.

Looks like you know what you are doing, BUT pay attention to the little stuff. Like oil pump shaft direction AND head gasket oreintation. AND lifters before heads. Things like that.

Speedpro pistons are fine with regular ring package, but a more expensive piston with thinner rings means less friction AND less heat.

I usually do Felpro 1011-2, 1250, 1415. Head intake header gaskets.
 
Last edited: Sep 14, 2026
Reactions: smittys7up and DadLife0724

keel

Active Member
Aug 23, 2020
282
128
53
Seattle, Wa
Sep 15, 2026
#13
  • Sep 15, 2026
  • #13
smittys7up said:
Noobz347 - I'm agreeing with your cam choices, thank you for the detailed info. Think I'll sell the B cam and pickup a TF Stage 1.
Click to expand...
+1 for the TFS1 cam, I've got one in my car and it's awesome. Great sound and driveability, even with no tune.
 
Reactions: smittys7up, General karthief and gkomo
S

smittys7up

Member
Nov 29, 2025
3
3
13
Michigan
Sep 16, 2026
#14
  • Sep 16, 2026
  • #14
keel said:
+1 for the TFS1 cam, I've got one in my car and it's awesome. Great sound and driveability, even with no tune.
Click to expand...

Stock ecu and injectors? What other parts are you running it with?
 

keel

Active Member
Aug 23, 2020
282
128
53
Seattle, Wa
Sep 16, 2026
#15
  • Sep 16, 2026
  • #15
smittys7up said:
Stock ecu and injectors? What other parts are you running it with?
Click to expand...
Stock bottom end with GT40 intake manifold and GT40 3-bar heads with upgraded valve springs. I ran it for a few years like that with basically everything else stock (injectors, throttle body, airbox/intake, MAF, ECU) and it ran good.

I recently went to a bigger throttle body, calibrated MAF, and 24lb injectors and it probably picked up some but to be honest my butt dyno didn't feel any difference.
 
Reactions: smittys7up
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2026
CAMTWO1070
H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
535
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
S
Progress Thread 1989 LX 5.0 convertible - mild project
  • Scott_S
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 5 6 7
Replies
122
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 15, 2026
DadLife0724
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?