• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

5.0 Rebuild

  • Thread starter Thread starter smittys7up
  • Start date Start date Nov 29, 2025
  • Tags Tags
    5.0 foxbody gt40p rebuild
S

smittys7up

Member
Nov 29, 2025
1
1
13
Michigan
Nov 29, 2025
#1
  • Nov 29, 2025
  • #1
Hello,

First time poster and excited to be here.

Picked up my first Mustang - 1990 5.0 with a 5 speed a few months ago. It appears to be a 7up edition but have not verified this. So I've only drove it about 45 minutes home after the initial purchase and then around the block a couple times. After parking it I found a decent amount of oil leaking onto the ground, and most of the engine, trans, underbody seems to be saturated. With winter now set in here in Michigan I figured this is the time to tear into it.

So upon pulling the motor I've found the valve cover bolts to be finger tight lol. Assuming this was the source it since oil was caked all over the engine bay. I've picked up some Explorer parts including upper/lower intake and GT40P heads. I mocked up a set of BBK shorty equal length headers and they may work with 90 degree boots. I also have a B303 cam, 24lb injectors w/ calibrated MAF on the shelf. I have read the A9L ECU can handle these sort of changes, I hope this is true. Just going for a close to stock or mild build.

So today I disassembled the GT40P heads. Need to extract the broken intake bolt I found. But other than that, the disassembly went well. I tried cutting a deep well socket and using my drill press to remove the valve springs. Definitely paid off. I do have the hand crank spring compressor tool and after doing 1 spring by hand I'll go witht eh socket/drill press method from here on out!

I'll attach some photos of the car/engine/heads. I did a dry and wet compression test and then a leak down at 100psi. I'll attach those notes as well. Figure the results weren't horrible and the car was running fine, but any opinions on the results or anything else is this build are welcomed! Would hate to miss some simple stuff while I'm this far in.

TIA
Jake
 
Reactions: gkomo

Mcmahst

5 Year Member
Jan 19, 2021
666
261
83
Laguna Woods CA, fort Mohave AZ
Nov 30, 2025
#2
  • Nov 30, 2025
  • #2
Welcome. Nice find. Should be a fun project. Good luck.
 
Reactions: smittys7up

gkomo

now i can hopefully expect to receive the shaft
Aug 2, 2024
2,138
1,382
133
San Diego, CA
Nov 30, 2025
#3
  • Nov 30, 2025
  • #3
Keep us posted with progress and pictures!

And yes I believe the stock computer can handle all that you have planned.

Hell I ran a H/C/I 331 with 24lb injectors and calibrated MAF, no ‘tune’ or chip, just the stock A9L and it ripped.
 
Reactions: smittys7up and General karthief

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,296
1,636
214
Acworth, GA
Dec 4, 2025
#4
  • Dec 4, 2025
  • #4
Looks like a really clean car. Are you going to change all the gaskets on the engine while it's out. I'd do a rear main seal, a nice one piece oil pan gasket, front seal, etc.

Kurt
 

AeroCoupe

lube between the nut and the face. I know my lubes
Founding Member
Oct 28, 2001
5,816
3,951
183
Claremore, OK
Dec 4, 2025
#5
  • Dec 4, 2025
  • #5
Timing chain, new oil pump with pickup and hardened ARP oil pump drive shaft. What are your plans on the GT40 heads? At a minimum you will need some decent springs for the cam. If you have not already thought of this then these are probably the most common setup for a stock iron head:

https://www.trickflow.com/parts/tfs-2500100#overview
 
Last edited: Dec 5, 2025
Reactions: JD1964, slow84lx and General karthief
P

Praetorious

Active Member
May 22, 2020
91
54
28
living room.
Dec 20, 2025
#6
  • Dec 20, 2025
  • #6
Man what a nice car,the interior is in great shape,body is straight and the paint looks good too, for what i assume (by your location) is a northern car it must have been garaged most of its life cause it still has its body,lol, what a fantastic winter project.

I used to have one of those hoods on my 91 but mine didn't have the grilled inserts, not sure why i got rid of it but its been a couple of decades,
i wish you lots of fun with the car and the guys here are top notch when it comes to knowledge, they got you covered.
 
Reactions: smittys7up

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
42,941
21,125
234
Box behind Walmart
Dec 20, 2025
#7
  • Dec 20, 2025
  • #7
This is just for reference and includes my current list of off-the-shelf cams for GT40P upgrades.

I included the B-303 in the last line just as a reference to the others.

Oh, and I assumed a 3:55 rear end gear (N/A setups respond very well to this).

302 / GT40P Street Cam Reference Table​

CamshaftDuration @ .050"Valve Lift (Int/Exh)Recommended Springs (GT40P-friendly)
Trick Flow Stage 1 (TFS-51402000)221° / 225°.499" / .510"Comp GT40/P spring kit or Alex’s Parts Max Output II
Comp XE264HR (35-349-8)212° / 218°.512" / .512"Alex’s Parts Max Output II kit
Lunati Voodoo 20350711221° / 229°.549" / .565"Lunati LT73100K2 or LT74820K1 spring kits
AFM N-41~222° / ~232°~.512" / ~.512"Alex’s Parts Max Output II (for lift margin)
Ford E-303 (M-6250-E303)220° / 220°.498" / .498"Comp GT40/P spring kit or Alex’s Parts Max Output II
Ford B-303 (M-6250-B303)224° / 224°.480" / .480"Comp GT40/P spring kit (easy clearance)

Notes (Important for a GT40P + 3.55 build)​


1 “Best match” for your combo?
With 3.55 gears, long-tubes, and GT40P heads:
Trick Flow Stage 1 or Comp XE264HR will feel perfect on the street — fat torque, EFI friendly, no drama.


2 Lift limits on P-heads:
Above ~.510" lift, check retainer/guide clearance.
The Lunati cam is a monster, but you’re into “measure everything” territory.


3 B-303 vs modern grinds:
The B-303 is useful as a comparison point — but the newer profiles absolutely walk it in torque and drivability.


4 Idle personality ranking (mild → rowdy):
XE264HR → E-303 → TFS1 → B-303 → N-41 → Lunati
- The last two generally require a tune.
- None of these setups require 24 lb injectors so, save yourself some money. Even if you have them, it will run better on 19s without a tune.
- If you add boost later, you'll likely need some #42+ injectors.
 

nickyb

I gotta say i never painted my nuts, Never Ever
15 Year Member
Apr 3, 2009
2,979
1,623
153
nevada
Dec 20, 2025
#8
  • Dec 20, 2025
  • #8
I'd be a little Leary of those compression numbers, seems like 20% .
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
42,941
21,125
234
Box behind Walmart
Dec 20, 2025
#9
  • Dec 20, 2025
  • #9
nickyb said:
I'd be a little Leary of those compression numbers, seems like 20% .
Click to expand...


Send It!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
705
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
621
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
822
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2026
CAMTWO1070
H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
171
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
S
Progress Thread 1989 LX 5.0 convertible - mild project
  • Scott_S
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 4 5 6
Replies
107
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Friday at 12:13 PM
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?