• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Build Thread '83 T-top Coupe - Welding Holes in My Rear

  • Thread starter Thread starter Davedacarpainter
  • Start date Start date Aug 19, 2016
  • Tags Tags
    1983 t-top coupe fox full floor pan
Status
Not open for further replies.
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 149
  • 150
  • 151
  • 152
  • 153
  • …
  • 304
Next
First Prev 151 of 304 Next Last

Mstng93SSP

You have a nice rear end there Dave.
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
2,993
3,500
184
Mililani, Hawaii
Nov 15, 2017
#3,001
  • Nov 15, 2017
  • #3,001
There is definitely a joke here, tiny cranks being stroked and wet pu......ummm...I don't really want to be banned so I will leave it there.....
 
Reactions: RaggedGT, stangboy, Davedacarpainter and 2 others

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Nov 15, 2017
#3,002
  • Nov 15, 2017
  • #3,002
You got to look out for the angry wet pu...those are trouble.

Great progress Dave.

Like mike stated they should measure the cylinder first so you know what slugs to order. I’m not sure how much over bore a 6cyl can take.
 

Davedacarpainter

Chicks can make things hard if they’re inspired...
SN Certified Technician
Nov 28, 2015
11,833
11,633
203
64
Discordia
Nov 15, 2017
#3,003
  • Nov 15, 2017
  • #3,003
A5literMan said:
You got to look out for the angry wet pu...those are trouble.

Great progress Dave.

Like mike stated they should measure the cylinder first so you know what slugs to order. I’m not sure how much over bore a 6cyl can take.
Click to expand...
I’m going to call a couple places today to see if I can find out something. A 5.0 sc engine might be kind of neat. Probably not possible, but let’s find out, shall we?
 
Reactions: A5literMan

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,721
214
37
Hillsborough county
Nov 15, 2017
#3,004
  • Nov 15, 2017
  • #3,004
Lol! I think that may be a stretch
 

Davedacarpainter

Chicks can make things hard if they’re inspired...
SN Certified Technician
Nov 28, 2015
11,833
11,633
203
64
Discordia
Nov 15, 2017
#3,005
  • Nov 15, 2017
  • #3,005
A very little thing tonight, I popped out the freeze plugs. Woohoo!:zombie:

Notice our little Stop Leak friend is there as well.
 
Reactions: RaggedGT

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,721
214
37
Hillsborough county
Nov 15, 2017
#3,006
  • Nov 15, 2017
  • #3,006
Any word on the 5.0 stroker?
 

Davedacarpainter

Chicks can make things hard if they’re inspired...
SN Certified Technician
Nov 28, 2015
11,833
11,633
203
64
Discordia
Nov 15, 2017
#3,007
  • Nov 15, 2017
  • #3,007
a91what said:
Any word on the 5.0 stroker?
Click to expand...
Nah, busy day. I'll try calling now to Tom Morana, let's see if they work customer friendly hours.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,188
21,357
234
Box behind Walmart
www.stangnet.com
Nov 15, 2017
#3,008
  • Nov 15, 2017
  • #3,008
Davedacarpainter said:
Click to expand...

Actual matter is required in order to release energy. : Soooooo... Pretty sure that's not gonna work.
 
Reactions: FoxMustangLvr and Davedacarpainter

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,188
21,357
234
Box behind Walmart
www.stangnet.com
Nov 15, 2017
#3,009
  • Nov 15, 2017
  • #3,009
Mstng93SSP said:
There is definitely a joke here, tiny cranks being stroked and wet pu......ummm...I don't really want to be banned so I will leave it there.....
Click to expand...


You may be right.
 
Reactions: Mstng93SSP and RaggedGT

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Nov 18, 2017
#3,010
  • Nov 18, 2017
  • #3,010
So, check out the difference between the SC block caps/mains and a roller 302 block. You can really see how much material Ford took out of the 302 and why they typically fail in this area.

Dave's SC block:


My roller 302:


And a shot of my roller 351 for comparison:
 
Reactions: A5literMan and Davedacarpainter

droopie85gt

Hookers and Beer for life!
5 Year Member
Dec 26, 2016
1,028
818
153
Cordova, TN
Nov 18, 2017
#3,011
  • Nov 18, 2017
  • #3,011
Dang Dave. You have accomplished quite a bit and this thread has taken a turn towards softcore ****! You just need a bore gauge (cheap is ok) and a good mic and you can measure you bore (holes) yourself. (damn now I am adding to this filth)

I would bet the max overbore is .030. Maybe .060 if you sonic check the block to check the cylinder wall thicknesss. Since that definitely isn't a thin wall casting, I would believe you have some room there. Probably want to bore to get a few extra cubes anyway and make sure the holes are actually round. No since cheaping out on the cylinders and having all that lovely boost pressure find its way past the rings!!!
 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
68
Birmingham, al
m.imdb.com
Nov 19, 2017
#3,012
  • Nov 19, 2017
  • #3,012
droopie85gt said:
Dang Dave. You have accomplished quite a bit and this thread has taken a turn towards softcore ****! You just need a bore gauge (cheap is ok) and a good mic and you can measure you bore (holes) yourself. (damn now I am adding to this filth)

I would bet the max overbore is .030. Maybe .060 if you sonic check the block to check the cylinder wall thicknesss. Since that definitely isn't a thin wall casting, I would believe you have some room there. Probably want to bore to get a few extra cubes anyway and make sure the holes are actually round. No since cheaping out on the cylinders and having all that lovely boost pressure find its way past the rings!!!
Click to expand...

While it is possible to check your cylinder bore yourself, it is one measuring device that I'd never buy because it'd get used once every 10-20 YEARS...
I agree Dave, @Davedacarpainter you're probably gonna wanna just go ahead and just consider having it bored.
The bore on the engine is 3.810...and from the pics looks like you could almost get away with leaving it standard,..but it's gonna take somebody with a dial bore gauge to tell the tale on that.

Here's the really cool part about boring the engine.

If the Pistons that you buy are truly " custom", they'll make them for your engine in any bore size that you dictate.
(Like .010 over 3.820 final bore)
As long as the cylinder will "clean up" at that minimal over bore, keeping it small has multiple benefits:
It'll leave more material, cylinder wall integrity will be greater. it'll stay round better, allowing for more boost, a better sealing ring ( more power, less blow by), and over bore room should some calamity occur in the future.

*The only limitation to that, is being able to get a good cylinder ring at your chosen bore size.

But guess what? A 3.810 Essex, bored .010 over uses the same ring that a Buick 3.8 uses when bored .020.
(Or Ford 2.3 4 banger bored .040 if it makes you feel better)

When I built my engine, I had all 6 cylinders bored .186 and had them sleeve all six holes. #1 was so badly worn it couldn't be saved, so rather than sleeve one, I had them sleeve 'em all. A stock 250 I-6 has a 3.6820 bore. It is exclusive to itself...you cannot get a decent ring at that bore size. So my engine with its brand new standard bores, was bored .020 to 3.700, so I could use a better piston ring.
( 3.700 is the bore of the Subaru Boxer engine used in WRX.)

I was just looking at your engine online..I'm sure that you know that the factory made that engine in sizes 3.9 up to 4.2......they never changed the bore to get there, only increasing the stroke each time.

It looks like a great engine to me,..and as pointed out by Nik,..is built better from the factory than any Windsor with regard to main cap strength..I will really look hard at using this engine should the monster engine fail bad enough to force a start over.

Great choice in the engine Dave,..I'm glad I talked you into it.
 
Reactions: A5literMan, 90sickfox, Davedacarpainter and 1 other person

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,265
17,952
224
Massachusetts
Nov 19, 2017
#3,013
  • Nov 19, 2017
  • #3,013
Is a 4.2 stoker worthwhile?
 

Davedacarpainter

Chicks can make things hard if they’re inspired...
SN Certified Technician
Nov 28, 2015
11,833
11,633
203
64
Discordia
Nov 19, 2017
#3,014
  • Nov 19, 2017
  • #3,014
Mustang5L5 said:
Is a 4.2 stoker worthwhile?
Click to expand...
Yes. Meaning it will help satisfy the Tim "The Toolman" Taylor side of me. Though it would mean changing to a non-forged crank. With the power levels I'm seeking though, it doesn't matter. I found one guy online that says he got 900hp out of the non-forged crank and no twisting problems. Seems like an engine tested on a wishful thinking dyno, but I'm sure he has way more than i'm even thinking about for mine.

Fact is, I can get a 4.3 or 4.4 stroker kit for it. All's it takes is money......
 
Reactions: General karthief

Davedacarpainter

Chicks can make things hard if they’re inspired...
SN Certified Technician
Nov 28, 2015
11,833
11,633
203
64
Discordia
Nov 19, 2017
#3,015
  • Nov 19, 2017
  • #3,015
madmike1157 said:
While it is possible to check your cylinder bore yourself, it is one measuring device that I'd never buy because it'd get used once every 10-20 YEARS...
I agree Dave, @Davedacarpainter you're probably gonna wanna just go ahead and just consider having it bored.
The bore on the engine is 3.810...and from the pics looks like you could almost get away with leaving it standard,..but it's gonna take somebody with a dial bore gauge to tell the tale on that.

Here's the really cool part about boring the engine.

If the Pistons that you buy are truly " custom", they'll make them for your engine in any bore size that you dictate.
(Like .010 over 3.820 final bore)
As long as the cylinder will "clean up" at that minimal over bore, keeping it small has multiple benefits:
It'll leave more material, cylinder wall integrity will be greater. it'll stay round better, allowing for more boost, a better sealing ring ( more power, less blow by), and over bore room should some calamity occur in the future.

*The only limitation to that, is being able to get a good cylinder ring at your chosen bore size.

But guess what? A 3.810 Essex, bored .010 over uses the same ring that a Buick 3.8 uses when bored .020.
(Or Ford 2.3 4 banger bored .040 if it makes you feel better)

When I built my engine, I had all 6 cylinders bored .186 and had them sleeve all six holes. #1 was so badly worn it couldn't be saved, so rather than sleeve one, I had them sleeve 'em all. A stock 250 I-6 has a 3.6820 bore. It is exclusive to itself...you cannot get a decent ring at that bore size. So my engine with its brand new standard bores, was bored .020 to 3.700, so I could use a better piston ring.
( 3.700 is the bore of the Subaru Boxer engine used in WRX.)

I was just looking at your engine online..I'm sure that you know that the factory made that engine in sizes 3.9 up to 4.2......they never changed the bore to get there, only increasing the stroke each time.

It looks like a great engine to me,..and as pointed out by Nik,..is built better from the factory than any Windsor with regard to main cap strength..I will really look hard at using this engine should the monster engine fail bad enough to force a start over.

Great choice in the engine Dave,..I'm glad I talked you into it.
Click to expand...
I agree that it is a nice little engine to make good power with.

I'm still in limbo on exactly what i will do for the rotating assembly. There are lots of options. First though, I think I'll get the block dipped and have the sonic testing done. Then I can start seeing what it needs as in overboring, etc...

It's really freaking dirty right now and the cylinders are a bit crusty. With my cheap little digital micrometer I could check the size close to the top. They're roughly 3.805 with a questionable gauge that can't measure deeper into the bore. What does that mean? Pretty much nothing, I'll get the machine shop to do the measurements for me when I drop it off for the cleaning.

This means it'll go to the machine shop two times. Before you say how stupid this is, read my reasoning.

1. I won't be able to spend the big bucks on this engine until the end of January. So no rotating assembly till then. If the shop will require it to do the work on the block, that puts that on hold. Yet I will need a bore size to select the pistons. So it might possibly get bored out at the initial drop off stage. I'll have a long talk with the machinist.

2. Getting it cleaned will allow proper measurements of the cylinders to be made and get an accurate idea if it needs to be bored out and, therefore, of what sized pistons I will need.

3. Getting it cleaned, and decked too while it's there, and then getting it back will allow me to do some of the pretty making stuff I want to do to the block. Not painting it yet, that'll happen after the last of the machine work that might be required.

4. Sure, i could just wait and have it all done at once, and maybe I still will. Not doing anything right now is about to drive me insane.

I'm kind of wondering what I'm going to do while the blocks away, maybe I need to start looking at the sc seats for entertainment.
 
Reactions: A5literMan, 90sickfox, RaggedGT and 2 others

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
68
Birmingham, al
m.imdb.com
Nov 19, 2017
#3,016
  • Nov 19, 2017
  • #3,016
Davedacarpainter said:
I agree that it is a nice little engine to make good power with.

I'm still in limbo on exactly what i will do for the rotating assembly. There are lots of options. First though, I think I'll get the block dipped and have the sonic testing done. Then I can start seeing what it needs as in overboring, etc...

It's really freaking dirty right now and the cylinders are a bit crusty. With my cheap little digital micrometer I could check the size close to the top. They're roughly 3.805 with a questionable gauge that can't measure deeper into the bore. What does that mean? Pretty much nothing, I'll get the machine shop to do the measurements for me when I drop it off for the cleaning.

This means it'll go to the machine shop two times. Before you say how stupid this is, read my reasoning.

1. I won't be able to spend the big bucks on this engine until the end of January. So no rotating assembly till then. If the shop will require it to do the work on the block, that puts that on hold. Yet I will need a bore size to select the pistons. So it might possibly get bored out at the initial drop off stage. I'll have a long talk with the machinist.

2. Getting it cleaned will allow proper measurements of the cylinders to be made and get an accurate idea if it needs to be bored out and, therefore, of what sized pistons I will need.

3. Getting it cleaned, and decked too while it's there, and then getting it back will allow me to do some of the pretty making stuff I want to do to the block. Not painting it yet, that'll happen after the last of the machine work that might be required.

4. Sure, i could just wait and have it all done at once, and maybe I still will. Not doing anything right now is about to drive me insane.

I'm kind of wondering what I'm going to do while the blocks away, maybe I need to start looking at the sc seats for entertainment.
Click to expand...

You can only square deck the block, which will make for an unecessary process. Because you'll want to have them deck the block to zero deck height after that. And that can only be accomplished with the Pistons mocked up in the 4 outside holes..so bottom line...
You'll be waiting on that process ( decking) until January too.
 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter

Davedacarpainter

Chicks can make things hard if they’re inspired...
SN Certified Technician
Nov 28, 2015
11,833
11,633
203
64
Discordia
Nov 19, 2017
#3,017
  • Nov 19, 2017
  • #3,017
madmike1157 said:
You can only square deck the block, which will make for an unecessary process. Because you'll want to have them deck the block to zero deck height after that. And that can only be accomplished with the Pistons mocked up in the 4 outside holes..so bottom line...
You'll be waiting on that process ( decking) until January too.
Click to expand...
So then, cleaning, checking the integrity of the block and measurements for the first trip.

Thanks for the help thinking through this mike.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Nov 19, 2017
#3,018
  • Nov 19, 2017
  • #3,018
A >4L boosted V6 makes me all giggly. That's bigger than some Euro and Japanese V8s.
 
Reactions: A5literMan, FastDriver, 90sickfox and 1 other person

Davedacarpainter

Chicks can make things hard if they’re inspired...
SN Certified Technician
Nov 28, 2015
11,833
11,633
203
64
Discordia
Nov 19, 2017
#3,019
  • Nov 19, 2017
  • #3,019
NIKwoaC said:
A >4L boosted V6 makes me all giggly. That's bigger than some Euro and Japanese V8s.
Click to expand...
Me too Nik!

It'll seem slow since I can't start buying the fancy stuff till january though,

I like steve's build a lot. My little M90 won't seem too trick.

Right now I'm salivating over the rotating assembly I'll be getting.

Come January I'll be blowing a good $8k to $9k on the engine. I'm excited and feeling a little nauseous at the same time.

The choice right now is between the 4.3l and the 4.4l stroker kit. I've got some serious calls to make between Super Six and Tom Morana.
 
Reactions: a91what, A5literMan and 90sickfox

Davedacarpainter

Chicks can make things hard if they’re inspired...
SN Certified Technician
Nov 28, 2015
11,833
11,633
203
64
Discordia
Nov 19, 2017
#3,020
  • Nov 19, 2017
  • #3,020
For those that are interested, the regular 3.8 block shouldn’t be bored over by more than .065”.

I still need to see if the sc engine is the same.
 
Reactions: A5literMan
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 149
  • 150
  • 151
  • 152
  • 153
  • …
  • 304
Next
First Prev 151 of 304 Next Last
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Progress Thread 87 T-top slow progress
  • wobbyguy
  • Feb 2, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
794
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 10, 2025
nickyb
Progress Thread 93 LX father son project
  • ZAM93LX
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 3, 2025
Scrapla347
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
533
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 6, 2026
85GT4V
TKX Install in the Coupe
  • AeroCoupe
  • Apr 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
48
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 26, 2026
Noobz347
O
Progress Thread LTD-ing
  • OX1
  • Mar 15, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
393
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 6, 2026
OX1
O
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?