• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Resolved Question about Matt Farah’s Foxbody

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alldegree
  • Start date Start date Mar 11, 2024
  • Tags Tags
    engine fox body horsepower question

Alldegree

5 Year Member
Sep 14, 2019
355
103
63
Charleston
Mar 11, 2024
#1
  • Mar 11, 2024
  • #1
Greetings ladies and gentlemen, it’s been too long!

I was watching this video of Matt Farah’s car and he mentioned that the Ford Performance crate engine he had in it was making 350 HP with a mild cam, Mac headers, a set of GT40X cylinder heads, and an explorer intake. I looked on Ford’s website and that motor does indeed make about 340 HP.

I have been led to believe that making over 300 HP on a stock displacement 302 is difficult without some kind of forced induction, so what’s happening here? Does the GT40X just flow that well, or do you think he had them ported?

The reason I’m asking (beyond curiosity) is because I’m going to be looking at a rebuild sometime in the future and 300 I feel is the sweet spot for these cars with regards to the balance between performance and streetability, so if I can replicate that somehow it would save me the trouble and expense of moving up to a 351 or getting a stroker kit.

Thanks in advance, I look forward to learning something new.
 

AeroCoupe

lube between the nut and the face. I know my lubes
Founding Member
Oct 28, 2001
5,888
4,015
183
Claremore, OK
Mar 11, 2024
#2
  • Mar 11, 2024
  • #2
340 fwhp is very achievable on a NA 302. 340 rwhp is different.
 
Reactions: Alldegree

nickyb

I gotta say i never painted my nuts, Never Ever
15 Year Member
Apr 3, 2009
2,979
1,626
153
nevada
Mar 11, 2024
#3
  • Mar 11, 2024
  • #3
I don't know what or who lead you to belive 300 hp was unachievable without a power adder. Since trick flow Top end kits are making 350/360 hp for ever.
You can rebuild your stock block with 30 over pistons and a good top end kit .
 
Reactions: Alldegree

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,100
21,281
234
Box behind Walmart
Mar 11, 2024
#4
  • Mar 11, 2024
  • #4
Big heads, small cam, and enough fuel and induction to support it. Done
 
Reactions: Alldegree

Alldegree

5 Year Member
Sep 14, 2019
355
103
63
Charleston
Mar 11, 2024
#5
  • Mar 11, 2024
  • #5
nickyb said:
I don't know what or who lead you to belive 300 hp was unachievable without a power adder. Since trick flow Top end kits are making 350/360 hp for ever.
You can rebuild your stock block with 30 over pistons and a good top end kit .
Click to expand...
I heard this from my engine guy before I moved. He told me I needed a rebuild and we discussed options, I told him my goals and he told me that 300 was difficult.

He was also very quick to point out that he had a 347 short block for sale, so that’s probably why he told me that HP factoid.

I’m pretty sure he wasn’t lying about my need for a rebuild, it’s ticking pretty bad sometimes and I’m losing oil pressure as the temp rises. Thicker oil is helping for now, but it’s only a matter of time.

That’s good to hear that I can achieve my goals with a stock block. I had heard about those trick flow top end kits, I wonder what that guy’s explanation would be for them. I almost bought one before they all disappeared during the pandemic.

Thank you to all who replied. It seems I have been operating under some bad information, I appreciate you guys setting me straight.
 
Last edited: Mar 11, 2024
Reactions: nickyb

AeroCoupe

lube between the nut and the face. I know my lubes
Founding Member
Oct 28, 2001
5,888
4,015
183
Claremore, OK
Mar 12, 2024
#6
  • Mar 12, 2024
  • #6
Another option to the TFS top end kit is to call Ed Curtis at Flowtech Induction and have him spec out heads, cam, and intakes. My guess is with one of his custom cams it will make more hp. I would also say that if you can get your hands on an Explorer upper and lower for cheap then send them to TMoss for a port job would most likley be the cheapest upper and lower that will flow really well.

If your car is not your DD then pulling the existing motor and having a reputable shop go through the short block would be what I would do. Get that back to the house and finish the motor myself and drop it back in the car.
 
Reactions: General karthief

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,259
17,943
224
Massachusetts
Mar 12, 2024
#7
  • Mar 12, 2024
  • #7
Alldegree said:
I was watching this video of Matt Farah’s car and he mentioned that the Ford Performance crate engine he had in it was making 350 HP with a mild cam, Mac headers, a set of GT40X cylinder heads, and an explorer intake. I looked on Ford’s website and that motor does indeed make about 340 HP.
Click to expand...

I think it would make 340HP with a better intake. The explorer is not it. The engines probably got some great low end torque, but I would guess he's really in the 330HP (flywheel) range with that combo.
 

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Mar 12, 2024
#8
  • Mar 12, 2024
  • #8
I doubt his car makes 350hp at the tire...but I'm only going off of your description ( never really looked up his car ). If you stroke your engine to 331 with a good cam, heads and intake you can get close to 400rwhp. A 306, built right, can get 300hp, too. Ed is a wizard with cams...and Tmoss is the same with intakes. Another option would be to use a carb intake and Holley efi with the heads and cam. The intakes are cheaper. Won't have to buy injectors and easier to get tuning. The good ol cheap Quarterhorse isn't available anymore, factory computers are starting to fail, and megasquirt is great but you need to be able to learn engine management systems quickly.

I can remember my first powerful mustang. The stock brakes faded super quick and it handled like crap. Especially, on ramps and off ramps. Almost crashed multiple times just because the car itself couldn't handle it. My current car is a beast and drives great all around.
 
Last edited: Mar 12, 2024
Reactions: Alldegree

Alldegree

5 Year Member
Sep 14, 2019
355
103
63
Charleston
Mar 12, 2024
#9
  • Mar 12, 2024
  • #9
AeroCoupe said:
Another option to the TFS top end kit is to call Ed Curtis at Flowtech Induction and have him spec out heads, cam, and intakes. My guess is with one of his custom cams it will make more hp. I would also say that if you can get your hands on an Explorer upper and lower for cheap then send them to TMoss for a port job would most likley be the cheapest upper and lower that will flow really well.
Click to expand...

I hadn’t heard of Ed Curtis, but I’ll definitely keep him in mind. Anything custom sounds expensive, but I’m only planning on doing this once so it may be worth a little extra money.
 

AeroCoupe

lube between the nut and the face. I know my lubes
Founding Member
Oct 28, 2001
5,888
4,015
183
Claremore, OK
Mar 12, 2024
#10
  • Mar 12, 2024
  • #10

FlowTech Induction Systems

Automotive Performance
flowtechinduction.com

They are not that much more than an off the shelf cam and you will make more power if you answer the questions on the camshaft tech sheet honestly. Form is found here:

Cam Tech Form

flowtechinduction.com

I have two of Ed's camshafts and I know several others on here have them as well. IMO worth the money.
 
Reactions: 90sickfox, Alldegree and limp

Alldegree

5 Year Member
Sep 14, 2019
355
103
63
Charleston
Mar 12, 2024
#11
  • Mar 12, 2024
  • #11
AeroCoupe said:

FlowTech Induction Systems

Automotive Performance
flowtechinduction.com

They are not that much more than an off the shelf cam and you will make more power if you answer the questions on the camshaft tech sheet honestly. Form is found here:

Cam Tech Form

flowtechinduction.com

I have two of Ed's camshafts and I know several others on here have them as well. IMO worth the money.
Click to expand...
I think I know the measurements for about half of this form. The block is stock but I know it’s had some machining done in the past so I wouldn’t want to give the wrong information. I also don’t know anything about the cam that’s in it, I know it’s not stock though.

That being said, I don’t really mind getting the measurements. I guess I’m just impressed at how thorough this whole thing is, it’s pretty cool. You’ve definitely sold me on it.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,259
17,943
224
Massachusetts
Mar 13, 2024
#12
  • Mar 13, 2024
  • #12
Just keep in mind, with his custom grind cams he usually recommends a spring upgrade. So that will be additional cost.
 
Reactions: Alldegree

Willybill32

But at least it's tight!
5 Year Member
Jul 16, 2019
630
353
83
Lexington, KY
Mar 16, 2024
#13
  • Mar 16, 2024
  • #13
Alldegree said:
Greetings ladies and gentlemen, it’s been too long!

I was watching this video of Matt Farah’s car and he mentioned that the Ford Performance crate engine he had in it was making 350 HP with a mild cam, Mac headers, a set of GT40X cylinder heads, and an explorer intake. I looked on Ford’s website and that motor does indeed make about 340 HP.

I have been led to believe that making over 300 HP on a stock displacement 302 is difficult without some kind of forced induction, so what’s happening here? Does the GT40X just flow that well, or do you think he had them ported?

The reason I’m asking (beyond curiosity) is because I’m going to be looking at a rebuild sometime in the future and 300 I feel is the sweet spot for these cars with regards to the balance between performance and streetability, so if I can replicate that somehow it would save me the trouble and expense of moving up to a 351 or getting a stroker kit.

Thanks in advance, I look forward to learning something new.
Click to expand...
You’ve already gotten a lot of feedback, but here’s my 2 cents worth. I have an ‘86 GT I bought new. Fairly recently I added TFS TW 170 heads, E303 cam, 1.6 roller rockers, Edelbrock Performer intake, 24 lb. Injectors, a BBK MAF and 65mm throttle body. My combo dyno’d at 315 HP and 349 lb. ft. of torque at the rear wheels with the original H-pipe in place, so it’s not that difficult.

Bill
 
Reactions: Potomus Pete, qikgts, General karthief and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
302 Engine build questions
  • Vulpes5.0
  • Apr 19, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
6K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 10, 2022
LEEDAY Boss
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
C
Progress Thread 2004 Comp Orange GT
  • ctandc
  • Jun 26, 2023
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
56
Views
5K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
ctandc
C
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?