Dyno Comparison Text: DBX VS PMAS MAF

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
40
98
MAINE
I have the opportunity to test out 2 meters in the past few months. The first dyno test was done w/ the DBX 97MM Mass air meter back on May 2ed. This Saturday Aug 8th I'll be going back for a re tune on the dyno but with a PMAS 95MM Velocity mass air meter. Same dyno, no other new mods at all.

Shortly after the May dyno tune ( Put down 333RWHP ) the DBX meter went bad on me. Took 6 weeks of chasing problems to finally figure out that it was the meter.

The PMAS 95MM Velocity meter came from Brown Santa today. I hooked it up and took the car out for a spin and the seat of the pants meter went off the chart!!! I cant belive how hard it pulled, I could not keep the rear tires planted w/ the Nitto DR's. I dont think the Cobra has ever pulled this hard before.

Conclusion: I think the DBX meter was going bad for quite awhile, even for the dyno tune so I dont think the 333 RWHP truly represents what the car has w/ the mods b/c it pulled like a raped ape tonight. It will be interesting to see the outcome this Saturday but I'll be highly surprised if it does not pull more this time around.

010-2.webp


VS:

001-21.webp
 
Unless its back to back, its not that great of comparison using dynos 3months apart and like u said, the old meter was probably on its way out.


It'll be interesting none the less, keep us posted.


not exactly an old meter. it was less then 1 yr since I bought it

Its as close as it can get the only difference is the temperature and that would be in favor of the DBX meter b/c its much warmer now.

Looking forward to results... where in Maine do you dyno??



Adam


I dont I go to Concord N.H
 
Here are the results. The base timing was moved from 10* to 12*. Found a few more HP in it but the mid range is much stronger and its still pulling hard all the way to redline.


DynoChart8-8-09.webp
 
just moved the dizzy and its tuned w/ a SCT Chip



The question is to is the improved power through the RPM range due to just moving the timing from 10* to 12* or did maybe something to do w/ the difference in meters? At 3,500 RPM Im pulling 100 more RWHP and TQ between the two runs