• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

30# Injectors too much?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhLoBuS
  • Start date Start date Sep 14, 2004

PhLoBuS

New Member
Aug 15, 2004
473
0
0
Beverly, MA
Sep 14, 2004
#1
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #1
I currently have Flowmaster 40 series, MAC CAI, MAC u/d pulleys, and 4.10 gears. Now I plan on putting these on sometime in the NEAR future...
Headers
H-pipe
E-cam
Edelbrock RPM II intake
70MM TB w/ spacer
Mass Air 73mm or 76mm
2400 Stall converter
255 fuel pump

Would 30# injectors be over doing it?
Also what would be more suitable a 73mm mass air or a 76mm?
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Sep 14, 2004
#2
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #2
The whole combination is mismatched. You dont need injectors now, but with the proper maf, they wont hurt, but they'll be no benifit. I suggest you do some research before ordering parts
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Sep 14, 2004
#3
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #3
Keep your stock 19lb injectors...

Alls the 30lb injectors will do is give you a rich smell and worse gas mileage...you'll need some nice "breathing mods" to support 30lb injectors...like a supercharger or a strong 302 h/c/i package...
 
M

Matts89LX5.0

Founding Member
Nov 1, 2002
1,314
0
36
Long Island, NY
Sep 14, 2004
#4
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #4
24 # inj are ok if you upgrade the entire fuel system. I have 24# MAF on my car, that is just bolt ons. Like they said, 30# inj kill gas mileage. Grn92 is rite as well, combo would be very missmatched. If anything, do some ported stock heads, if moneys an issue, cobra intake, bigger TB,& MAF
 
S

SPEED FREAK

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
1,448
0
0
Regina, SK.
Sep 14, 2004
#5
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #5
With the proper tunning and MAF meter 30 lb/hr injectors shouldn't make any difference in fuel economy (providing they aren't at 100% duty cycle all the time ). If you plan on buying them be sure to spend the money on dyno tuning at a reputable shop. If your car is running rich with the 30's then your computer does not have the proper tune or some other problem is occuring. 19 LB/HR injectors should be good for now. 24 LB/HR injectors will be more than enough if your stock ones are on their way out. They are what I would upgrade to if I were you.
 

itltrot

Founding Member
Nov 12, 2000
771
0
16
Ponca City, OK
Sep 14, 2004
#6
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #6
I agree with the masses 30# are probably going to be big for you combo as it is.

Pro-M has a chart that is a good guideline for when to upgrade injectors.

http://www.pro-flow.com/tech info/sizing.htm
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Sep 14, 2004
#7
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #7
SPEED FREAK said:
With the proper tunning and MAF meter 30 lb/hr injectors shouldn't make any difference in fuel economy (providing they aren't at 100% duty cycle all the time ). If you plan on buying them be sure to spend the money on dyno tuning at a reputable shop. If your car is running rich with the 30's then your computer does not have the proper tune or some other problem is occuring. 19 LB/HR injectors should be good for now. 24 LB/HR injectors will be more than enough if your stock ones are on their way out. They are what I would upgrade to if I were you.
Click to expand...


100% CORRECT!!
 
P

p5.0ny

Founding Member
Mar 22, 2001
133
0
16
Arnold, MO
Sep 14, 2004
#8
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #8
agree with everyone else. Also, that stall will not be a true 2400. It will be more like a 18-1900, which is just barely higher than stock. Go for a 30-3200 stall and that cam will work nicely. check my sig, I had to upgrade on the stall because I went the 2400 route earlier. It just sucked the life out the car, the stall was engaging and the cam had not made any power yet. Let the cam kick in and then the stall so you are in the powerband.
 

PhLoBuS

New Member
Aug 15, 2004
473
0
0
Beverly, MA
Sep 14, 2004
#9
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #9
Yeah they were not in order of how i was going to buy them/install them but if I do go with mass air sensors or injectors i will go with 24#. btw I have obviously not done research on injectors hence why i asked the question
 

maverick0716

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2002
3,924
0
56
Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Sep 14, 2004
#10
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #10
If you're not gonna do heads, don't get the RPM II intake. That intake is meant for a little higher rpm.....which stock heads definitly don't support.
 

N8Miller

I need NOS....make it 2 of the big ones
Founding Member
Jul 26, 2000
2,661
0
0
Kingston, PA, USA
Sep 14, 2004
#11
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #11
Grn92LX said:
The whole combination is mismatched. You dont need injectors now, but with the proper maf, they wont hurt, but they'll be no benifit. I suggest you do some research before ordering parts
Click to expand...

yep.

take a look at the 70mm throttle body and that RPM intake....over done. you should get a 65mm throttle body and a Performer intake. that will help you out more for the powerband that your going to be in. RPM intake at most.
also, go with the 76mm MAF.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Sep 14, 2004
#12
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #12
Sorry but with the stock ECU and no tune...30lb injectors even with the correct MAF will give you worse gas mileage...the fuel delivery is setup with the "duty cycles" for the 19's not the 30's...
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Sep 15, 2004
#13
  • Sep 15, 2004
  • #13
N8Miller said:
yep.

take a look at the 70mm throttle body and that RPM intake....over done. you should get a 65mm throttle body and a Performer intake. that will help you out more for the powerband that your going to be in. RPM intake at most.
also, go with the 76mm MAF.
Click to expand...


Thats actually not true man. You should match your TB to the inlet of your manifold. Doesn't mean you'll make more power, but its just better and will support better down the road. By the way, I have an accufab 65mm TB/egr spacer for sale, I just ordered my accufab 75mm yesterday PM me if anyones interested.

Sorry but with the stock ECU and no tune...30lb injectors even with the correct MAF will give you worse gas mileage...the fuel delivery is setup with the "duty cycles" for the 19's not the 30's
Click to expand...

Not true at all man, with the proper maf and the eec adapting to the changes, it'll still get good mileage. I also ordered a new 80mm pro m for 30's so my 24lb pro m 80mm is for sale too
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Sep 15, 2004
#14
  • Sep 15, 2004
  • #14
Grn92LX said:
Not true at all man, with the proper maf and the eec adapting to the changes, it'll still get good mileage. I also ordered a new 80mm pro m for 30's so my 24lb pro m 80mm is for sale too
Click to expand...

Well sure you can get "good mileage" but not as good as with the 19's and stock components...

With a h/c/i combo you engine flows more air which in turns tells the STOCK computer, MAF, etc...to give more fuel...which goes hand in hand with worse gas mileage...

More fuel given = More gas taken

Maybe that 80mm calibrated for the 30's will solve your problems...
 

PhLoBuS

New Member
Aug 15, 2004
473
0
0
Beverly, MA
Sep 15, 2004
#15
  • Sep 15, 2004
  • #15
what is an h/c/i combo? headers cam injectors?
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Sep 15, 2004
#16
  • Sep 15, 2004
  • #16
PhLoBuS said:
what is an h/c/i combo? headers cam injectors?
Click to expand...

Sorry...it is a common "shortcut" for heads, cam, intake....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
451
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
10K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
A
Engine 93 lx top end kit install now has no power.
  • anorth93
  • Aug 20, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 4 5 6
Replies
107
Views
13K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 25, 2023
Mindseye007
M
O
Computer swap
  • Oakman
  • Jun 22, 2024
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
588
The Welcome Wagon Jun 22, 2024
Oakman
O
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?